Preschoolers’ Win–Stay/Lose–Shift Strategy Use in the Children’s Gambling Task

Adaptive decision-making requires flexible responses to environmental feedback and integration of information over time. Win-stay/lose-shift strategies describe immediate responses to outcomes: repeating a choice after a win (win-stay) or switching after a loss (lose-shift). Although these strategies have been examined using the Preschool Gambling Task, no study has investigated them in the widely used Children's Gambling Task (CGT) to our knowledge. Our primary aim was to examine whether preschoolers adjust these strategies as they learn environmental contingencies. Using a shortened (40-trial) CGT with one advantageous deck (smaller rewards, smaller losses, net gains) and one disadvantageous deck (bigger rewards, bigger losses, net losses), we investigated strategy use in typically developing 3-5-year-old children (<i>N</i> = 98; 63% female; 88% white; 96% college-educated caregivers). A secondary aim examined whether higher cognitive self-regulation-executive function (EF) and metacognition-improves children's effective deck-specific strategy use. Results showed preschoolers increasingly adopted win-stay in the advantageous deck but showed reduced lose-shift over time regardless of deck. Three-year-olds used significantly less lose-shift than 4-to-5-year-olds. Critically, metacognition-but not EF-uniquely predicted deck-specific strategies: children who knew which deck was better used more win-stay in the advantageous deck and more lose-shift in the disadvantageous deck, controlling for age, verbal ability, and strategy use in the opposite deck. These findings illuminate preschoolers' strategic adaptation and highlight metacognition as a key driver of adaptive decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010023
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preschoolers’ Win–Stay/Lose–Shift Strategy Use in the Children’s Gambling Task

Seokyung Kim, Stephanie M. Carlson
Behavioral Sciences
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Preschoolers’ Win–Stay/Lose–Shift Strategy Use in the Children’s Gambling Task

Seokyung Kim, Stephanie M. Carlson
article en

Abstract

Adaptive decision-making requires flexible responses to environmental feedback and integration of information over time. Win-stay/lose-shift strategies describe immediate responses to outcomes: repeating a choice after a win (win-stay) or switching after a loss (lose-shift). Although these strategies have been examined using the Preschool Gambling Task, no study has investigated them in the widely used Children's Gambling Task (CGT) to our knowledge. Our primary aim was to examine whether preschoolers adjust these strategies as they learn environmental contingencies. Using a shortened (40-trial) CGT with one advantageous deck (smaller rewards, smaller losses, net gains) and one disadvantageous deck (bigger rewards, bigger losses, net losses), we investigated strategy use in typically developing 3-5-year-old children (<i>N</i> = 98; 63% female; 88% white; 96% college-educated caregivers). A secondary aim examined whether higher cognitive self-regulation-executive function (EF) and metacognition-improves children's effective deck-specific strategy use. Results showed preschoolers increasingly adopted win-stay in the advantageous deck but showed reduced lose-shift over time regardless of deck. Three-year-olds used significantly less lose-shift than 4-to-5-year-olds. Critically, metacognition-but not EF-uniquely predicted deck-specific strategies: children who knew which deck was better used more win-stay in the advantageous deck and more lose-shift in the disadvantageous deck, controlling for age, verbal ability, and strategy use in the opposite deck. These findings illuminate preschoolers' strategic adaptation and highlight metacognition as a key driver of adaptive decision-making.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(1)
University of Minnesota (US)
University of Minnesota, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.