What moves the user? Multi-domain motivations behind window and blinds interactions from a user perspective in open-plan offices

• The OBdrive application surveys the real-time motivations behind window and blind control actions • Motivations differed between the 2 case study offices, reflecting building and occupant differences • Windows were mainly opened due to warm discomfort combined with poor air quality • Windows closing was motivated by cold discomfort, even at high CO 2 levels, and contextual factors • Blinds were operated mainly due to the visual discomfort, with little influence of contextual factors Office employees are influenced by various environmental and contextual factors that prompt interaction with building interfaces, such as adjusting windows or blinds. These behaviours can impact predictions of buildings’ performance. While occupant behaviour models often rely on physical variables, they tend to overlook users’ actual motivations and how these interact. This study introduces a novel mobile application, OBdrive, that uniquely captures occupants’ motivations in real-time, offering direct insights into why users operate windows, blinds, and lights. OBdrive forms a central element of the eCOMBINE framework (“Interaction between energy use, COMfort, Behaviour and the INdoor Environment in office buildings”), applied across five monitoring campaigns in two open-plan offices in Switzerland. The analyses highlight the diverse range of motivations underlying occupants’ interaction with windows and blinds. In addition to single environmental drivers (e.g., 45% of window-open actions in response to warm discomfort), multi-domain discomforts often act in combination to prompt adaptive behaviours (e.g., 32% of the recorded opening windows actions were linked to the co-occurrence of warm discomfort and poor air quality). Occupants’ behaviour (e.g., window closing actions) can be linked to time-related and contextual factors, such as departing office and requirements from co-workers. The findings demonstrated that both explicit and “hidden” motivations (e.g., co-worker asked, save energy, mask noise) drive human–building interactions (HBIs), and that these motivations are rarely captured in traditional field studies. Therefore, the eCOMBINE framework, along with the OBdrive application, offers a means to unravel the combinations of motivations driving occupant behaviours in buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114162
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What moves the user? Multi-domain motivations behind window and blinds interactions from a user perspective in open-plan offices

Arnab Chatterjee, Verena Marie Barthelmes, Dusan Licina, Dolaana M. Khovalyg et al.
Building and Environment
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

What moves the user? Multi-domain motivations behind window and blinds interactions from a user perspective in open-plan offices

Arnab Chatterjee, Verena Marie Barthelmes, Dusan Licina, Dolaana M. Khovalyg, Marilyne Andersen, Jan Wienold, Kun Lyu, Caroline Karmann, Viviana Gonzalez Serrano
article en

Abstract

• The OBdrive application surveys the real-time motivations behind window and blind control actions • Motivations differed between the 2 case study offices, reflecting building and occupant differences • Windows were mainly opened due to warm discomfort combined with poor air quality • Windows closing was motivated by cold discomfort, even at high CO 2 levels, and contextual factors • Blinds were operated mainly due to the visual discomfort, with little influence of contextual factors Office employees are influenced by various environmental and contextual factors that prompt interaction with building interfaces, such as adjusting windows or blinds. These behaviours can impact predictions of buildings’ performance. While occupant behaviour models often rely on physical variables, they tend to overlook users’ actual motivations and how these interact. This study introduces a novel mobile application, OBdrive, that uniquely captures occupants’ motivations in real-time, offering direct insights into why users operate windows, blinds, and lights. OBdrive forms a central element of the eCOMBINE framework (“Interaction between energy use, COMfort, Behaviour and the INdoor Environment in office buildings”), applied across five monitoring campaigns in two open-plan offices in Switzerland. The analyses highlight the diverse range of motivations underlying occupants’ interaction with windows and blinds. In addition to single environmental drivers (e.g., 45% of window-open actions in response to warm discomfort), multi-domain discomforts often act in combination to prompt adaptive behaviours (e.g., 32% of the recorded opening windows actions were linked to the co-occurrence of warm discomfort and poor air quality). Occupants’ behaviour (e.g., window closing actions) can be linked to time-related and contextual factors, such as departing office and requirements from co-workers. The findings demonstrated that both explicit and “hidden” motivations (e.g., co-worker asked, save energy, mask noise) drive human–building interactions (HBIs), and that these motivations are rarely captured in traditional field studies. Therefore, the eCOMBINE framework, along with the OBdrive application, offers a means to unravel the combinations of motivations driving occupant behaviours in buildings.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 291
Integrated Oncology (United States) (US), Air Vehicle Integrated Design (United States) (US), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Bundesamt für Energie
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.