Assessing Multidimensional Poverty in the European Union: Insights From SDG 1 and the Benefit of the Doubt Approach

ABSTRACT The eradication of poverty remains one of the greatest economic challenges of the 21st century, particularly in light of transformations in labour markets, demographic shifts, and recent crises such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1) acknowledges the need for broader approaches to measuring and addressing poverty, going beyond income‐based metrics to include multiple social and economic dimensions. This article analyses the evolution of multidimensional poverty across European Union countries between 2015 and 2023, using 11 indicators linked to SDG 1. The benefit of the doubt (BoD) method is employed to construct a composite index with endogenously determined weights, allowing for cross‐country comparisons that account for national specificities. The findings reveal distinct regional patterns: Northern and Western European countries, such as Finland and the Czech Republic, demonstrated stronger performance, while Southern and Eastern European countries continued to face persistent vulnerabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manchester School
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.70030
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Multidimensional Poverty in the European Union: Insights From SDG 1 and the Benefit of the Doubt Approach

Fernando Henrique Taques, Antonio Reinaldo Silva Neto, Miguel Gustavo Gomes da Silva
Manchester School
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Assessing Multidimensional Poverty in the European Union: Insights From SDG 1 and the Benefit of the Doubt Approach

Fernando Henrique Taques, Antonio Reinaldo Silva Neto, Miguel Gustavo Gomes da Silva
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The eradication of poverty remains one of the greatest economic challenges of the 21st century, particularly in light of transformations in labour markets, demographic shifts, and recent crises such as the COVID‐19 pandemic. Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1) acknowledges the need for broader approaches to measuring and addressing poverty, going beyond income‐based metrics to include multiple social and economic dimensions. This article analyses the evolution of multidimensional poverty across European Union countries between 2015 and 2023, using 11 indicators linked to SDG 1. The benefit of the doubt (BoD) method is employed to construct a composite index with endogenously determined weights, allowing for cross‐country comparisons that account for national specificities. The findings reveal distinct regional patterns: Northern and Western European countries, such as Finland and the Czech Republic, demonstrated stronger performance, while Southern and Eastern European countries continued to face persistent vulnerabilities.

Manchester School
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Multidimensional Poverty in the European Union: Insights From SDG 1 and the Benefit of the Doubt Approach — Fernando Henrique Taques, Antonio Reinaldo Silva Neto, et al. · Manchester School (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS