Grotius and Hobbes: The Necessities of Human Nature

Abstract Our understanding of the politics of necessity and of necessities of human beings determines how peacefully or violently we respond in moments of crisis. Today’s global order of great powers seems to have parallels to Hugo Grotius and Thomas Hobbes’s period, a fact that prompts us to analyse their concept of necessity and necessities. Against realist interpretations, the article argues that Grotius and Hobbes coincide in establishing clear limits to violence in international order and in advocating the goal of a peaceful preservation of human beings as individuals and as a species. Moreover, both authors appeal to normative considerations, which are nevertheless not always reflected upon in the literature. While Grotius moves within a classic cosmology of justice, Hobbes’s naturalistic stand founded on ‘conatus’ or ‘endeavor’, sees in human nature the guide for necessity and necessities. We conclude that Grotius’s is the most promising position for the survival and thriving of human beings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Grotiana
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-46010017
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grotius and Hobbes: The Necessities of Human Nature

J. Oosterhuis, Monica Garcia-Salmones Rovira
Grotiana
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Grotius and Hobbes: The Necessities of Human Nature

J. Oosterhuis, Monica Garcia-Salmones Rovira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our understanding of the politics of necessity and of necessities of human beings determines how peacefully or violently we respond in moments of crisis. Today’s global order of great powers seems to have parallels to Hugo Grotius and Thomas Hobbes’s period, a fact that prompts us to analyse their concept of necessity and necessities. Against realist interpretations, the article argues that Grotius and Hobbes coincide in establishing clear limits to violence in international order and in advocating the goal of a peaceful preservation of human beings as individuals and as a species. Moreover, both authors appeal to normative considerations, which are nevertheless not always reflected upon in the literature. While Grotius moves within a classic cosmology of justice, Hobbes’s naturalistic stand founded on ‘conatus’ or ‘endeavor’, sees in human nature the guide for necessity and necessities. We conclude that Grotius’s is the most promising position for the survival and thriving of human beings.

GrotianaVol. 46(1)
Maastricht University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Grotius and Hobbes: The Necessities of Human Nature — J. Oosterhuis, Monica Garcia-Salmones Rovira · Grotiana (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS