Repairing AI: How Breakages of Algorithmic Systems Reveal Repair Efforts and Possibilities for Renewal

Abstract: With the election of Donald Trump, many regulations for ethical, fair, and safe AI in the United States have been removed, and techno-optimistic rhetoric reigns over concerns for consumer safety and human rights. The European Union has been called out for stifling innovation through regulation. As the AI Act comes into effect, criticism of its many loopholes prevails, and oversight and enforcement have yet to materialize. But regulation is only one of many approaches to responsible AI. Direct responses to breaking, malfunctioning, or faulty technology allow for repair, shaping good practices, and informing good governance. This article explores the notions of breakage, repair, and renewal. Algorithmic systems are deployed in today's digital societies for various purposes but often appear unfit to perform their tasks satisfactorily. Compensating for their shortcomings through various forms of repair work, such as design changes and policy decisions, is essential. The notions of breakage, repair, and renewal allow for a more nuanced understanding of issues that arise from the promotion and implementation of AI systems, as well as a historically informed perspective on technology development and innovation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical AI
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703x-12095964
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repairing AI: How Breakages of Algorithmic Systems Reveal Repair Efforts and Possibilities for Renewal

Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Pekka Mäkelä
Critical AI
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Repairing AI: How Breakages of Algorithmic Systems Reveal Repair Efforts and Possibilities for Renewal

Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Pekka Mäkelä
article en

Abstract

Abstract: With the election of Donald Trump, many regulations for ethical, fair, and safe AI in the United States have been removed, and techno-optimistic rhetoric reigns over concerns for consumer safety and human rights. The European Union has been called out for stifling innovation through regulation. As the AI Act comes into effect, criticism of its many loopholes prevails, and oversight and enforcement have yet to materialize. But regulation is only one of many approaches to responsible AI. Direct responses to breaking, malfunctioning, or faulty technology allow for repair, shaping good practices, and informing good governance. This article explores the notions of breakage, repair, and renewal. Algorithmic systems are deployed in today's digital societies for various purposes but often appear unfit to perform their tasks satisfactorily. Compensating for their shortcomings through various forms of repair work, such as design changes and policy decisions, is essential. The notions of breakage, repair, and renewal allow for a more nuanced understanding of issues that arise from the promotion and implementation of AI systems, as well as a historically informed perspective on technology development and innovation.

Critical AIVol. 3(2)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Repairing AI: How Breakages of Algorithmic Systems Reveal Repair Efforts and Possibilities for Renewal — Mirko Tobias Schäfer, Pekka Mäkelä · Critical AI (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS