When is a central CO2 conditioning system beneficial for CCS from biogas?: A techno-economic analysis of capacities and distances

Biogas plants are expected to play an important role in the future global energy system and hold a large potential for achieving negative CO 2 emissions. In Denmark, CO 2 separation is implemented in the majority of biogas plants. Therefore, their CO 2 is readily available, only requiring the subsequent process steps conditioning, transportation, and storage to exploit the biogenic CO 2 for net-negative emissions. However, biogas plants are relatively small point sources, which may result in high CCS deployment costs. Therefore, this study investigates how two biogas plants could economically benefit from sharing a common conditioning system. The technical performance of the processes are evaluated through process modelling and simulation, and a detailed economic analysis is used to evaluate the costs of the system. Four different options with different degrees of centralisation were considered. It was investigated for which emission levels and transport distances a centralised system shared between at least two biogas plants could be relevant. A shared conditioning system was found to yield economic benefits when two plants were located within 5 km to 10 km and when only the liquefaction and purification subprocesses were centralised. The results show that permanent storage of CO 2 from biogas plants can be cost-competitive with other negative emission technologies. Furthermore, an average cost saving of 13 % can be achieved by relevant existing Danish plants when the CO 2 conditioning process is shared between at least two biogas plants. • Detailed techno-economic analysis of centralised conditioning system for biogas CCS. • Presentation of the technical and economic models and assumptions. • Analysis of four different integration options with various degrees of centralisation. • Biogas CCS is cost-competitive with other negative emission technologies. • A centralised system showed economic benefits for two plants located within 5 km to 10 km.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104563
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When is a central CO2 conditioning system beneficial for CCS from biogas?: A techno-economic analysis of capacities and distances

Lars O. Nord, Jonas Kjær Jensen, Rikke C. Pedersen, Simon Roussanaly
International journal of greenhouse gas control
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

When is a central CO2 conditioning system beneficial for CCS from biogas?: A techno-economic analysis of capacities and distances

Lars O. Nord, Jonas Kjær Jensen, Rikke C. Pedersen, Simon Roussanaly
article en

Abstract

Biogas plants are expected to play an important role in the future global energy system and hold a large potential for achieving negative CO 2 emissions. In Denmark, CO 2 separation is implemented in the majority of biogas plants. Therefore, their CO 2 is readily available, only requiring the subsequent process steps conditioning, transportation, and storage to exploit the biogenic CO 2 for net-negative emissions. However, biogas plants are relatively small point sources, which may result in high CCS deployment costs. Therefore, this study investigates how two biogas plants could economically benefit from sharing a common conditioning system. The technical performance of the processes are evaluated through process modelling and simulation, and a detailed economic analysis is used to evaluate the costs of the system. Four different options with different degrees of centralisation were considered. It was investigated for which emission levels and transport distances a centralised system shared between at least two biogas plants could be relevant. A shared conditioning system was found to yield economic benefits when two plants were located within 5 km to 10 km and when only the liquefaction and purification subprocesses were centralised. The results show that permanent storage of CO 2 from biogas plants can be cost-competitive with other negative emission technologies. Furthermore, an average cost saving of 13 % can be achieved by relevant existing Danish plants when the CO 2 conditioning process is shared between at least two biogas plants. • Detailed techno-economic analysis of centralised conditioning system for biogas CCS. • Presentation of the technical and economic models and assumptions. • Analysis of four different integration options with various degrees of centralisation. • Biogas CCS is cost-competitive with other negative emission technologies. • A centralised system showed economic benefits for two plants located within 5 km to 10 km.

International journal of greenhouse gas controlVol. 149
SINTEF (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.