How Should We Study Heterogeneity in Entrepreneurship? Moving the Field to an Inclusive Approach

Entrepreneurship scholarship faces challenges related to diverse populations, striving to balance inclusivity with the recognition of unique entrepreneurial identities. Applying optimal distinctiveness theory, we explore the relationship between belongingness and uniqueness in entrepreneurship research. Catalyzed by Bakker and McMullen’s 2023 article on inclusivity in entrepreneurship, we utilized natural language processing to examine responses about inclusive entrepreneurship from 29 scholars dedicated to marginalized populations. Findings suggest that employing varied research methods and integrating structural and epistemological considerations can enhance our understanding of entrepreneurial heterogeneity. We advocate for entrepreneurship research that values individual experiences while promoting inclusive practices, highlighting the need for evolving scholarly paradigms to reflect entrepreneurial differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BFH: ARBOR
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12527
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Should We Study Heterogeneity in Entrepreneurship? Moving the Field to an Inclusive Approach

Rosanna Garcia, Jan Keim, Pascal Dey, Ezekiel Bonillas et al.
BFH: ARBOR
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

How Should We Study Heterogeneity in Entrepreneurship? Moving the Field to an Inclusive Approach

Rosanna Garcia, Jan Keim, Pascal Dey, Ezekiel Bonillas, [et al.], Rachel M. B. Atkins
article en

Abstract

Entrepreneurship scholarship faces challenges related to diverse populations, striving to balance inclusivity with the recognition of unique entrepreneurial identities. Applying optimal distinctiveness theory, we explore the relationship between belongingness and uniqueness in entrepreneurship research. Catalyzed by Bakker and McMullen’s 2023 article on inclusivity in entrepreneurship, we utilized natural language processing to examine responses about inclusive entrepreneurship from 29 scholars dedicated to marginalized populations. Findings suggest that employing varied research methods and integrating structural and epistemological considerations can enhance our understanding of entrepreneurial heterogeneity. We advocate for entrepreneurship research that values individual experiences while promoting inclusive practices, highlighting the need for evolving scholarly paradigms to reflect entrepreneurial differences.

BFH: ARBOR
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), St. John's University (US), California State University, San Bernardino (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.