Reflecting on the Implications of the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review for Design and Technology in England

This reflection critically examines the implications of the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review (CAR) for Design and Technology (D&T) education in England. Drawing on our role as expert advisors to the Department for Education (DfE), we explore the Review’s recommendations for clarifying the subject’s purpose, refining curriculum content, and embedding sustainability, social responsibility, and inclusivity. We argue that while the Review articulates a progressive vision for D&T, significant challenges remain in addressing systemic barriers such as declining participation, inequitable access, and assessment practices. The discussion highlights opportunities for strengthening applied knowledge areas (digital literacy, oracy, and climate education) while cautioning against structural constraints that risk further marginalising the subject. We conclude that realising the Review’s ambitions requires targeted investment in teacher development, infrastructure, and inclusive curriculum design, alongside assessment reform. Without these measures, D&T’s potential as a vital bridge between creativity, technology, and societal needs may remain unrealised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liverpool John Moores University
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24377/dteij.article3433
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflecting on the Implications of the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review for Design and Technology in England

Alison Hardy, Matt McLain
Liverpool John Moores University
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Reflecting on the Implications of the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review for Design and Technology in England

Alison Hardy, Matt McLain
article en

Abstract

This reflection critically examines the implications of the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review (CAR) for Design and Technology (D&T) education in England. Drawing on our role as expert advisors to the Department for Education (DfE), we explore the Review’s recommendations for clarifying the subject’s purpose, refining curriculum content, and embedding sustainability, social responsibility, and inclusivity. We argue that while the Review articulates a progressive vision for D&T, significant challenges remain in addressing systemic barriers such as declining participation, inequitable access, and assessment practices. The discussion highlights opportunities for strengthening applied knowledge areas (digital literacy, oracy, and climate education) while cautioning against structural constraints that risk further marginalising the subject. We conclude that realising the Review’s ambitions requires targeted investment in teacher development, infrastructure, and inclusive curriculum design, alongside assessment reform. Without these measures, D&T’s potential as a vital bridge between creativity, technology, and societal needs may remain unrealised.

Liverpool John Moores University
Nottingham Trent University (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.