A comparative mathematical modeling study of phenotypic approaches to T cell activation

T cells use their T cell antigen receptors (TCRs) to recognize peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules (pMHC). These peptides may be low-affinity self-peptides or high-affinity foreign peptides from pathogens. Despite recognizing a broad range of affinities, TCRs trigger significant immune responses only to strongly binding foreign peptides. The mechanisms enabling T cells to distinguish diverse antigens with high sensitivity remain a key focus of research. Our goal is to analyze mathematical models of T-cell activation for their ability to replicate key experimental features like optimal response, specificity, sensitivity, and antigen discrimination. We analyzed nine models using mathematical and numerical methods to examine their solutions, responses, and parameter sensitivity. We found that in all models, except kinetic proofreading with negative feedback, solutions converged to a unique steady state. Most response functions defined by ligand concentration and dissociation time showed an optimum value, except for the Occupancy, KPR, and stabilizing activation chain models. Models like KPR with negative feedback, limited/sustained signaling, and incoherent feedforward loops effectively reproduced the key features of specificity, sensitivity, and antigen discrimination. Our sensitivity analysis identified phosphorylation rate as a key parameter influencing most model outcomes. This study highlights the strengths and limitations of current T-cell activation models, suggests directions for improving to enhance their predictive accuracy in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32255-9
Primary Topic
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative mathematical modeling study of phenotypic approaches to T cell activation

Yogesh Bali, Alan D. Rendall
Scientific Reports
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
article

A comparative mathematical modeling study of phenotypic approaches to T cell activation

Yogesh Bali, Alan D. Rendall
article en

Abstract

T cells use their T cell antigen receptors (TCRs) to recognize peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex molecules (pMHC). These peptides may be low-affinity self-peptides or high-affinity foreign peptides from pathogens. Despite recognizing a broad range of affinities, TCRs trigger significant immune responses only to strongly binding foreign peptides. The mechanisms enabling T cells to distinguish diverse antigens with high sensitivity remain a key focus of research. Our goal is to analyze mathematical models of T-cell activation for their ability to replicate key experimental features like optimal response, specificity, sensitivity, and antigen discrimination. We analyzed nine models using mathematical and numerical methods to examine their solutions, responses, and parameter sensitivity. We found that in all models, except kinetic proofreading with negative feedback, solutions converged to a unique steady state. Most response functions defined by ligand concentration and dissociation time showed an optimum value, except for the Occupancy, KPR, and stabilizing activation chain models. Models like KPR with negative feedback, limited/sustained signaling, and incoherent feedforward loops effectively reproduced the key features of specificity, sensitivity, and antigen discrimination. Our sensitivity analysis identified phosphorylation rate as a key parameter influencing most model outcomes. This study highlights the strengths and limitations of current T-cell activation models, suggests directions for improving to enhance their predictive accuracy in future research.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.