The effect of publicly co-funded industry-science collaboration on scientific production

Competitive industry-science collaboration programs encourage academic scientists to co-develop innovation projects with firms. These programs combine attributes of competitive research funding and science commercialization policies. Because they demand more time and effort than traditional science funding, and may push applicants toward projects with higher commercial potential, the question arises whether they come at the expense of scientific productivity or alter the direction of research. Using data from a large-scale, cross-country R&D policy, we find no evidence of negative impacts on science. On the contrary, our analysis shows an increase in joint scientific publications with industrial partners, while the overall direction of research remains unchanged. • We study if collaboration programs affect science output or direction. • We evaluate the EU flagship program Eurostars. • Participation increases joint publications with industrial partners. • Scientific productivity is not negatively affected. • Research direction remains unchanged despite firm involvement.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105393
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of publicly co-funded industry-science collaboration on scientific production

Research Policy
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

The effect of publicly co-funded industry-science collaboration on scientific production

article en

Abstract

Competitive industry-science collaboration programs encourage academic scientists to co-develop innovation projects with firms. These programs combine attributes of competitive research funding and science commercialization policies. Because they demand more time and effort than traditional science funding, and may push applicants toward projects with higher commercial potential, the question arises whether they come at the expense of scientific productivity or alter the direction of research. Using data from a large-scale, cross-country R&D policy, we find no evidence of negative impacts on science. On the contrary, our analysis shows an increase in joint scientific publications with industrial partners, while the overall direction of research remains unchanged. • We study if collaboration programs affect science output or direction. • We evaluate the EU flagship program Eurostars. • Participation increases joint publications with industrial partners. • Scientific productivity is not negatively affected. • Research direction remains unchanged despite firm involvement.

Research PolicyVol. 55(2)
Vilnius University (LT), Centre for European Economic Research (DE), Copenhagen Business School (DK), University of Luxembourg (LU), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.