Cronyism, Patronage and Nepotism in Ivan Kukuljević’s Correspondence

This research combines both qualitative and quantitative approach of historical network analysis to analyse, visualize, and interpret selected letters from the corpus of correspondence of Ivan Kukuljević Sakcinski, representing practices of favouritism (cronyism, patronage, and nepotism). The forms of favouritism are observed as a practice, by applying concepts from the social ontology of Theodore Schatzki. The analysis has shown that all periods of peak favouritism correspond with Kukuljević’s political positions and power, as well as with his social capital manifested through his relationship with Viceroy Ivan Mažuranić. The analysis also highlights the significance of the Society for Yugoslavian History as a central node that gathered most petitioners during its period of greatest activity. A close analysis of two series of letters – between Ivan Kukuljević Sakcinski and Ivan Mažuranić, and between Kukuljević and Marija Jambrišak – reveals a vivid practice of cronyism, nepotism, and reciprocity, and an evolving personal relationship between a patron and his protégé.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Croatian history
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22586/bardd933
Primary Topic
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cronyism, Patronage and Nepotism in Ivan Kukuljević’s Correspondence

Tihana Kušter
Review of Croatian history
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
article

Cronyism, Patronage and Nepotism in Ivan Kukuljević’s Correspondence

Tihana Kušter
article en

Abstract

This research combines both qualitative and quantitative approach of historical network analysis to analyse, visualize, and interpret selected letters from the corpus of correspondence of Ivan Kukuljević Sakcinski, representing practices of favouritism (cronyism, patronage, and nepotism). The forms of favouritism are observed as a practice, by applying concepts from the social ontology of Theodore Schatzki. The analysis has shown that all periods of peak favouritism correspond with Kukuljević’s political positions and power, as well as with his social capital manifested through his relationship with Viceroy Ivan Mažuranić. The analysis also highlights the significance of the Society for Yugoslavian History as a central node that gathered most petitioners during its period of greatest activity. A close analysis of two series of letters – between Ivan Kukuljević Sakcinski and Ivan Mažuranić, and between Kukuljević and Marija Jambrišak – reveals a vivid practice of cronyism, nepotism, and reciprocity, and an evolving personal relationship between a patron and his protégé.

Review of Croatian historyVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Historical Influence and Diplomacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.