The Enterprise AI Governance Buyer's Guide
This publication presents a vendor-neutral framework for evaluating enterprise AI governance solutions based on evidentiary rigor rather than marketing claims. It addresses a central challenge in enterprise AI adoption: the inability of most governance approaches to prove that governance controls were functioning correctly at the moment a specific AI decision was made. The guide distinguishes probabilistic governance approaches—such as model-level guardrails, content filtering, and statistical confidence measures—from deterministic, fail-closed governance systems capable of producing reproducible, independently verifiable audit artifacts. It introduces the Four Tests Standard (4TS): Reproducibility, Verifiability, Completeness, and Boundedness, and proposes a baseline qualification gate requiring third-party replay of historical governance decisions. The publication includes practical due-diligence questions for procurement teams, risk officers, General Counsel, auditors, and technical evaluators, along with an illustrative proof-carrying decision artifact and mappings to common regulatory requirements (e.g., audit trails, electronic records, and record retention obligations). The framework is intended to support governance evaluation in regulated and high-stakes environments, with emphasis on auditability, liability allocation, regulatory defensibility, and post-incident verification. While developed by FERZ AI, the evaluation criteria are architecture-agnostic and may be applied to any AI governance solution.
Authors
- Edward Meyman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8012-6100)
- FERZ AI
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18002694
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00