Sorted and Tracked: English Learners, College-Level Course-Taking in High School, and Postsecondary Opportunity

Drawing from frameworks of categorical inequality and leveled tracking, this study examines how English learners (EL) status serves as a label that limits students’ access to college-level course-taking in high school and subsequent postsecondary opportunities. We find that EL–never-EL gaps in postsecondary outcomes vary by the timing of reclassification but are largely explained by student and school factors. We also show that ELs reclassified in later grades take fewer college-level courses than both never-EL students and ELs reclassified earlier. Nonlinear variance decomposition analyses reveal that a substantial portion of these outcome gaps is attributable to differences in college-level course-taking. We conclude by sharing insights from district staff to help schools support EL students in completing college-level coursework and expanding their postsecondary opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251392299
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sorted and Tracked: English Learners, College-Level Course-Taking in High School, and Postsecondary Opportunity

Esmeralda Sánchez Salazar, Irina Chukhray, Brian Holzman, Weiqi Guo
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
School Choice and Performance
article

Sorted and Tracked: English Learners, College-Level Course-Taking in High School, and Postsecondary Opportunity

Esmeralda Sánchez Salazar, Irina Chukhray, Brian Holzman, Weiqi Guo
article en

Abstract

Drawing from frameworks of categorical inequality and leveled tracking, this study examines how English learners (EL) status serves as a label that limits students’ access to college-level course-taking in high school and subsequent postsecondary opportunities. We find that EL–never-EL gaps in postsecondary outcomes vary by the timing of reclassification but are largely explained by student and school factors. We also show that ELs reclassified in later grades take fewer college-level courses than both never-EL students and ELs reclassified earlier. Nonlinear variance decomposition analyses reveal that a substantial portion of these outcome gaps is attributable to differences in college-level course-taking. We conclude by sharing insights from district staff to help schools support EL students in completing college-level coursework and expanding their postsecondary opportunities.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.