Conversaciones informales en la investigación social

Informal conversations have no place in social research methodology textbooks.In the field of sociology, there are hardly any references to them, leaving informal conversations as a lesser status compared to interviews, and difficult to justify both methodologically and epistemologically.In the case of anthropology, informal conversations can be understood as part of participant observation or life histories; that is, as part of qualitative and longitudinal research methodologies.However, in both cases, there is no thoughts that allows methodological value to be given to this everyday practice, which is common in interactions between researchers and informants, especially when these interactions occur over long periods of time.This paper discusses the current role of informal and everyday conversations in these disciplines.Based on this discussion, a definition of informal conversations is proposed, distinguishing them from interviews.Similarly, a distinction is made between two types of informal conversations depending on their intentional or unintentional alignment with research objectives.We propose some uses of interest for research are shown, and the need to include them in methodological designs, both in preliminary projects and final reports.We conclude by highlighting the usefulness of this type of interaction in longitudinal qualitative research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cinta de moebio
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2025000200003
Primary Topic
Educational theories and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversaciones informales en la investigación social

Jaime de la Calle-Valverde
Cinta de moebio
Educational theories and practices
article

Conversaciones informales en la investigación social

Jaime de la Calle-Valverde
article en

Abstract

Informal conversations have no place in social research methodology textbooks.In the field of sociology, there are hardly any references to them, leaving informal conversations as a lesser status compared to interviews, and difficult to justify both methodologically and epistemologically.In the case of anthropology, informal conversations can be understood as part of participant observation or life histories; that is, as part of qualitative and longitudinal research methodologies.However, in both cases, there is no thoughts that allows methodological value to be given to this everyday practice, which is common in interactions between researchers and informants, especially when these interactions occur over long periods of time.This paper discusses the current role of informal and everyday conversations in these disciplines.Based on this discussion, a definition of informal conversations is proposed, distinguishing them from interviews.Similarly, a distinction is made between two types of informal conversations depending on their intentional or unintentional alignment with research objectives.We propose some uses of interest for research are shown, and the need to include them in methodological designs, both in preliminary projects and final reports.We conclude by highlighting the usefulness of this type of interaction in longitudinal qualitative research.

Cinta de moebio(83)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Educational theories and practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.