Methodology for Analyzing the Reliability of Geophysical Methods That Use Portable Devices for Forecasting Dynamic Phenomena

The article presents a methodology for analyzing the reliability of geophysical methods that use portable instruments for forecasting dynamic phenomena. The need for developing this methodology is explained by the lack of recommendations in regulatory documents regarding the selection of the most appropriate method to forecast dynamic phenomena for specific conditions. This selection should be carried out by the relevant departments of coal-mining companies independently or with the help of scientific teams. Two portable devices for local prediction of rock bumps were chosen for the research: the Angel-M and Ripas devices, which implement the electromagnetic pulse method and a specific modification of the method based on parameters of artificial acoustic signals, respectively. The more reliable instrumental method based on the drilling fines yield was used as the reference one. It was assumed that the hazard level of the rock mass is the same when making predictions using the geophysical and instrumental methods. It can be quantitatively estimated as a ratio of the current value of the measured parameter to its threshold value. The reliability of the predictions made with portable devices was assessed by the correspondence of this ratio to the similar one calculated for the instrumental method. Testing of the proposed methodology at one of the Kuzbass coal mines showed insufficient reliability of predictions made using portable geophysical devices. This is probably explained by the following reasons: each of the devices does not control all of the key hazard factors of dynamic phenomena; there is no justification of the relationship between the hazard of the dynamic phenomena and the parameters controlled by the devices; when using the Ripas device, the geophone is pressed against the wall of the mine workings, so the fracturing within the near-wall rock mass significantly distorts the spectrum of the sounding acoustic signal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismic Instruments
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/s0747923925700495
Primary Topic
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodology for Analyzing the Reliability of Geophysical Methods That Use Portable Devices for Forecasting Dynamic Phenomena

D. N. Zastrelov, A. V. Shadrin, M. S. Plaksin, D. G. Luzyanin
Seismic Instruments
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
article

Methodology for Analyzing the Reliability of Geophysical Methods That Use Portable Devices for Forecasting Dynamic Phenomena

D. N. Zastrelov, A. V. Shadrin, M. S. Plaksin, D. G. Luzyanin
article en

Abstract

The article presents a methodology for analyzing the reliability of geophysical methods that use portable instruments for forecasting dynamic phenomena. The need for developing this methodology is explained by the lack of recommendations in regulatory documents regarding the selection of the most appropriate method to forecast dynamic phenomena for specific conditions. This selection should be carried out by the relevant departments of coal-mining companies independently or with the help of scientific teams. Two portable devices for local prediction of rock bumps were chosen for the research: the Angel-M and Ripas devices, which implement the electromagnetic pulse method and a specific modification of the method based on parameters of artificial acoustic signals, respectively. The more reliable instrumental method based on the drilling fines yield was used as the reference one. It was assumed that the hazard level of the rock mass is the same when making predictions using the geophysical and instrumental methods. It can be quantitatively estimated as a ratio of the current value of the measured parameter to its threshold value. The reliability of the predictions made with portable devices was assessed by the correspondence of this ratio to the similar one calculated for the instrumental method. Testing of the proposed methodology at one of the Kuzbass coal mines showed insufficient reliability of predictions made using portable geophysical devices. This is probably explained by the following reasons: each of the devices does not control all of the key hazard factors of dynamic phenomena; there is no justification of the relationship between the hazard of the dynamic phenomena and the parameters controlled by the devices; when using the Ripas device, the geophone is pressed against the wall of the mine workings, so the fracturing within the near-wall rock mass significantly distorts the spectrum of the sounding acoustic signal.

Seismic InstrumentsVol. 61(5)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Federal Research Centre Coal and Coal Chemistry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.