Machine learning for resilience analysis: a review of systems under cyberattacks

Intelligent cyber-physical systems (CPS) are increasingly exposed to sophisticated cyberattacks, yet existing machine learning (ML)-focused surveys provide only fragmented coverage of the resilience lifecycle. They often separate attack modelling from defence strategies, overlook cross-sector insights, and lack clear evaluation benchmarks, limiting practical applicability. This review offers the first lifecycle-oriented synthesis of ML-enabled CPS resilience, covering detection, defence, recovery, and adaptation. It integrates diverse ML-based attack techniques with corresponding resilience mechanisms and provides a comparative analysis across two critical CPS sectors—power and water—to highlight shared vulnerabilities and sector-specific behaviours. The review further distils key limitations in current ML approaches, including data scarcity, interpretability challenges, and limited real-world validation. Finally, it proposes five actionable research directions and resilience quantification considerations to guide future development of robust and transferable ML-based CPS resilience frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.113542
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for resilience analysis: a review of systems under cyberattacks

Liz Varga, Ruoqing Yin
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Machine learning for resilience analysis: a review of systems under cyberattacks

Liz Varga, Ruoqing Yin
article en

Abstract

Intelligent cyber-physical systems (CPS) are increasingly exposed to sophisticated cyberattacks, yet existing machine learning (ML)-focused surveys provide only fragmented coverage of the resilience lifecycle. They often separate attack modelling from defence strategies, overlook cross-sector insights, and lack clear evaluation benchmarks, limiting practical applicability. This review offers the first lifecycle-oriented synthesis of ML-enabled CPS resilience, covering detection, defence, recovery, and adaptation. It integrates diverse ML-based attack techniques with corresponding resilience mechanisms and provides a comparative analysis across two critical CPS sectors—power and water—to highlight shared vulnerabilities and sector-specific behaviours. The review further distils key limitations in current ML approaches, including data scarcity, interpretability challenges, and limited real-world validation. Finally, it proposes five actionable research directions and resilience quantification considerations to guide future development of robust and transferable ML-based CPS resilience frameworks.

Engineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 166
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.