Mental health inequities affecting sexual and gender diverse individuals during the early COVID-19 period in Massachusetts

While the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected population-level mental health, research on mental health among sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals and intersectional identities is limited. We evaluated associations between gender, sexual, racial, and ethnic identities and moderate to severe psychological distress (≥15 days of self-reported poor mental health during the last 30 days) among adult residents of Massachusetts (n = 26,889) from September-November 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression with propensity score weighting and considered intersectional identities by race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender. Results: Respondents identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, asexual, or questioning (LGB+) experienced 83% increased odds of psychological distress compared to heterosexual/straight individuals (OR: 1.83 (1.34, 2.50); p < 0.001). Respondents identifying as transgender and/or nonbinary (TNB) had the highest prevalence of psychological distress and experienced 57% increased odds of psychological distress compared to the referent group (OR: 1.57 (1.21, 2.04); p < 0.001). Respondents identifying as Hispanic/Latinx, Black non-Hispanic (NH), or Asian NH reported reduced odds of psychological distress (Hispanic (OR: 0.75 (0.67, 0.84); p < 0.001), Black NH (OR: 0.75 (0.64, 0.88); p < 0.001), and Asian NH (OR: 0.61 (0.51,0.73); p < 0.001). We observed reduced odds of psychological distress among LGB+ respondents of color (OR: 1.03 (0.82, 1.29); p = 0.83) and TNB respondents of color (OR: 1.27 (0.73, 2.20); p = 0.39) compared to LGB+ and TNB estimates alone, although neither interaction was statistically significant. Mental health inequities among SGM individuals in Massachusetts were exacerbated during the early pandemic period. Social and structural inequities experienced by SGM individuals may contribute to higher risk of psychological distress. Public health policies and practices to address the root causes of inequities and promote mental health among SGM communities are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000341
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health inequities affecting sexual and gender diverse individuals during the early COVID-19 period in Massachusetts

McKane E. Sharff, Kerra Washington, Koen F. Tieskens, Lauren Cardoso et al.
PLOS mental health.
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Mental health inequities affecting sexual and gender diverse individuals during the early COVID-19 period in Massachusetts

McKane E. Sharff, Kerra Washington, Koen F. Tieskens, Lauren Cardoso, Xiaojing Peng, Yirong Yuan, Jessica H. Leibler, Ta-wei Lin, Caroline Stack, Elizabeth Beatriz, Prasad Patil
article en

Abstract

While the COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected population-level mental health, research on mental health among sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals and intersectional identities is limited. We evaluated associations between gender, sexual, racial, and ethnic identities and moderate to severe psychological distress (≥15 days of self-reported poor mental health during the last 30 days) among adult residents of Massachusetts (n = 26,889) from September-November 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression with propensity score weighting and considered intersectional identities by race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender. Results: Respondents identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, asexual, or questioning (LGB+) experienced 83% increased odds of psychological distress compared to heterosexual/straight individuals (OR: 1.83 (1.34, 2.50); p < 0.001). Respondents identifying as transgender and/or nonbinary (TNB) had the highest prevalence of psychological distress and experienced 57% increased odds of psychological distress compared to the referent group (OR: 1.57 (1.21, 2.04); p < 0.001). Respondents identifying as Hispanic/Latinx, Black non-Hispanic (NH), or Asian NH reported reduced odds of psychological distress (Hispanic (OR: 0.75 (0.67, 0.84); p < 0.001), Black NH (OR: 0.75 (0.64, 0.88); p < 0.001), and Asian NH (OR: 0.61 (0.51,0.73); p < 0.001). We observed reduced odds of psychological distress among LGB+ respondents of color (OR: 1.03 (0.82, 1.29); p = 0.83) and TNB respondents of color (OR: 1.27 (0.73, 2.20); p = 0.39) compared to LGB+ and TNB estimates alone, although neither interaction was statistically significant. Mental health inequities among SGM individuals in Massachusetts were exacerbated during the early pandemic period. Social and structural inequities experienced by SGM individuals may contribute to higher risk of psychological distress. Public health policies and practices to address the root causes of inequities and promote mental health among SGM communities are warranted.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 2(12)
Boston University (US), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.