EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF MENTORSHIP ON FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS IN BUSINESS ACCELERATORS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

This qualitative study examines how mentorship within business accelerators influences women founders’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy and, in turn, how self-efficacy shapes their interpretation and use of mentor feedback. Grounded in Human Resource Development (HRD) scholarship and Social Cognitive Theory, and informed by entrepreneurial learning, social capital, and intersectionality perspectives, the study conceptualizes accelerators as efficacy-shaping systems rather than neutral program containers. Using a qualitative design, the research draws on in-depth interviews with women entrepreneurs who participated in accelerator programs, complemented by program materials and cross-case thematic analysis. Findings indicate that accelerator mentoring practices operate through intertwined environmental, relational, and cognitive mechanisms that can both strengthen and erode self-efficacy. High-quality, relationally attuned mentoring; credible sponsorship; structured opportunities for reflection; and psychologically safe feedback processes functioned as efficacy-building levers that supported agency, learning, and venture action. In contrast, misaligned mentor–founder fit, ambiguous or inconsistent feedback, and credibility gaps, produced efficacy-erosive conditions that constrained participants’ confidence and diminished the developmental value of the accelerator experience. These insights are synthesized in the Accelerator Self-Efficacy Development (ASED) Framework, which models accelerators as developmental architectures in which program design, mentoring quality, social capital activation, and identity dynamics recursively shape belief and behavior. The study extends Social Cognitive Theory to organizationally designed ecosystems, advances HRD theory by positioning mentoring as developmental infrastructure for equity and capability-building, and offers practical guidance for funders, accelerator leaders, and HRD practitioners seeking to design ethical, equity-centered learning systems that more effectively support women entrepreneurs.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF MENTORSHIP ON FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS IN BUSINESS ACCELERATORS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF MENTORSHIP ON FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS IN BUSINESS ACCELERATORS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

article en

Abstract

This qualitative study examines how mentorship within business accelerators influences women founders’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy and, in turn, how self-efficacy shapes their interpretation and use of mentor feedback. Grounded in Human Resource Development (HRD) scholarship and Social Cognitive Theory, and informed by entrepreneurial learning, social capital, and intersectionality perspectives, the study conceptualizes accelerators as efficacy-shaping systems rather than neutral program containers. Using a qualitative design, the research draws on in-depth interviews with women entrepreneurs who participated in accelerator programs, complemented by program materials and cross-case thematic analysis. Findings indicate that accelerator mentoring practices operate through intertwined environmental, relational, and cognitive mechanisms that can both strengthen and erode self-efficacy. High-quality, relationally attuned mentoring; credible sponsorship; structured opportunities for reflection; and psychologically safe feedback processes functioned as efficacy-building levers that supported agency, learning, and venture action. In contrast, misaligned mentor–founder fit, ambiguous or inconsistent feedback, and credibility gaps, produced efficacy-erosive conditions that constrained participants’ confidence and diminished the developmental value of the accelerator experience. These insights are synthesized in the Accelerator Self-Efficacy Development (ASED) Framework, which models accelerators as developmental architectures in which program design, mentoring quality, social capital activation, and identity dynamics recursively shape belief and behavior. The study extends Social Cognitive Theory to organizationally designed ecosystems, advances HRD theory by positioning mentoring as developmental infrastructure for equity and capability-building, and offers practical guidance for funders, accelerator leaders, and HRD practitioners seeking to design ethical, equity-centered learning systems that more effectively support women entrepreneurs.

Scholar Works at UT Tyler (The University of Texas at Tyler)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.