Neural indices of phonological and acoustic–phonetic perception

Neural discriminative responses index acoustic-phonetic and phonological differences. This study examined how contextual complexity modulates neural discrimination of speech sounds. The neural discrimination of Japanese /ma/ and /na/ was examined in a single-standard versus multi-standard oddball paradigm. In each paradigm, there were within-phoneme and cross-phoneme conditions. The results demonstrated that the single-standard cross-phoneme condition (single-standard [ma] vs. deviant [na]) elicited the largest mismatch negativity (MMN), followed by the single-standard within-phoneme condition (single-standard [na] vs. deviant [na]), and then the multi-standard cross-phoneme condition (multi-standard [ma] vs. deviant [na]). The multi-standard cross-phoneme condition elicited a late discriminative negativity (LDN) unlike the single-standard cross-phoneme condition. The later timing of the effect in the multi-standard condition suggests that task influences processing at the level of the MMN and LDN. Future studies are needed to further determine how the magnitude of varying factors, such as speech voice, influences phonological processing.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain and Language
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105685
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural indices of phonological and acoustic–phonetic perception

Brain and Language
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Neural indices of phonological and acoustic–phonetic perception

article en

Abstract

Neural discriminative responses index acoustic-phonetic and phonological differences. This study examined how contextual complexity modulates neural discrimination of speech sounds. The neural discrimination of Japanese /ma/ and /na/ was examined in a single-standard versus multi-standard oddball paradigm. In each paradigm, there were within-phoneme and cross-phoneme conditions. The results demonstrated that the single-standard cross-phoneme condition (single-standard [ma] vs. deviant [na]) elicited the largest mismatch negativity (MMN), followed by the single-standard within-phoneme condition (single-standard [na] vs. deviant [na]), and then the multi-standard cross-phoneme condition (multi-standard [ma] vs. deviant [na]). The multi-standard cross-phoneme condition elicited a late discriminative negativity (LDN) unlike the single-standard cross-phoneme condition. The later timing of the effect in the multi-standard condition suggests that task influences processing at the level of the MMN and LDN. Future studies are needed to further determine how the magnitude of varying factors, such as speech voice, influences phonological processing.

Brain and LanguageVol. 273
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Waseda University (JP), City University of New York (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.