To ablate or not to ablate? Outcomes of local ablative treatments (LAT) for oncogene addicted (OA) oligo-metastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review

Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses distinct molecular phenotypes, each associated with specific clinical behavior and variable sensitivity to targeted therapies. Therapeutic advancements in the field enhanced clinical outcomes and overall prognostic improvement. Beyond the molecular profile, disease burden serves as a predictive marker for treatment response and overall prognostic outcomes. The current disease staging categorizes patients based on the number and sites of metastatic involvement. In this context, the addition of local ablative therapies (LAT) is candidate to enhance or prolong the effectiveness of standard systemic therapies. Our systematic review aims to summarize current evidence dealing with the outcomes of LAT in the context of oncogene addicted NSCLC. Over response results, we also reported side effects whenever available.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.105096
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To ablate or not to ablate? Outcomes of local ablative treatments (LAT) for oncogene addicted (OA) oligo-metastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review

Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

To ablate or not to ablate? Outcomes of local ablative treatments (LAT) for oncogene addicted (OA) oligo-metastatic (OM) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review

article en

Abstract

Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) encompasses distinct molecular phenotypes, each associated with specific clinical behavior and variable sensitivity to targeted therapies. Therapeutic advancements in the field enhanced clinical outcomes and overall prognostic improvement. Beyond the molecular profile, disease burden serves as a predictive marker for treatment response and overall prognostic outcomes. The current disease staging categorizes patients based on the number and sites of metastatic involvement. In this context, the addition of local ablative therapies (LAT) is candidate to enhance or prolong the effectiveness of standard systemic therapies. Our systematic review aims to summarize current evidence dealing with the outcomes of LAT in the context of oncogene addicted NSCLC. Over response results, we also reported side effects whenever available.

Critical Reviews in Oncology/HematologyVol. 218
Humanitas University (IT), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.