A Qualitative Study of Staff and Provider Experiences with Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Community Health Center and Gastroenterology Specialty

Colorectal cancer screening is an effective strategy to prevent disease, reduce the risk of advanced-stage diagnosis, and improve survival. Timely follow-up of abnormal screening results, particularly abnormal fecal immunochemical tests, is essential to realizing these benefits. This qualitative study examined routine processes related to colonoscopy referral and completion for patients of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) referred to community gastroenterology (GI) practices. Using a snowball sampling approach, five FQHC individuals and eight community GI practice individuals were interviewed. Interviews at the FQHC were conducted between March 2020 and September 2021, during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Due to clinic closures and other pandemic-related disruptions, GI practice interviews occurred between August 2021 and January 2023. Study findings highlight the need for improved communication and collaboration between primary care and GI practices to support colonoscopy completion among low resource populations. Interviewees also offered recommendations to ensure colonoscopy completion. Further research is needed to pilot test centralized referral and scheduling systems and to develop multicomponent interventions that address both patient and organizational barriers to colonoscopy completion.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15430/jcp.25.025
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Study of Staff and Provider Experiences with Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Community Health Center and Gastroenterology Specialty

Journal of Cancer Prevention
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

A Qualitative Study of Staff and Provider Experiences with Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Community Health Center and Gastroenterology Specialty

article en

Abstract

Colorectal cancer screening is an effective strategy to prevent disease, reduce the risk of advanced-stage diagnosis, and improve survival. Timely follow-up of abnormal screening results, particularly abnormal fecal immunochemical tests, is essential to realizing these benefits. This qualitative study examined routine processes related to colonoscopy referral and completion for patients of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) referred to community gastroenterology (GI) practices. Using a snowball sampling approach, five FQHC individuals and eight community GI practice individuals were interviewed. Interviews at the FQHC were conducted between March 2020 and September 2021, during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Due to clinic closures and other pandemic-related disruptions, GI practice interviews occurred between August 2021 and January 2023. Study findings highlight the need for improved communication and collaboration between primary care and GI practices to support colonoscopy completion among low resource populations. Interviewees also offered recommendations to ensure colonoscopy completion. Further research is needed to pilot test centralized referral and scheduling systems and to develop multicomponent interventions that address both patient and organizational barriers to colonoscopy completion.

Journal of Cancer PreventionVol. 30(4)
Oregon State University (US), University of Arizona (US), Arizona Science Center (US), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.