Spirals of inclusive curriculum design: Diversity of leadership, thinking and voice

This paper explores the development of an inclusive, employability-informed Level 5 common curriculum within the Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences at Lancaster University. Drawing on Hui’s (2023) articulation of the need for spiralling processes of unlearning, redoing, and relearning, we describe how this project sought to reimagine curriculum design as an inclusive and recursive practice. We examine how intentional spaces were created to enable collaboration between academics, professional services staff, and students, challenging traditional hierarchies of expertise and authority. Through reflection on leadership, design processes, and student engagement, we offer insights into the messiness and opportunities with inclusive curriculum development. Our findings suggest that inclusion requires more than just content reform, it demands structural and methodological shifts that centre diverse voices and foster ongoing dialogue.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Lancaster University Education Conference
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71957/mzrs3983
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spirals of inclusive curriculum design: Diversity of leadership, thinking and voice

Proceedings of the Lancaster University Education Conference
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Spirals of inclusive curriculum design: Diversity of leadership, thinking and voice

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the development of an inclusive, employability-informed Level 5 common curriculum within the Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences at Lancaster University. Drawing on Hui’s (2023) articulation of the need for spiralling processes of unlearning, redoing, and relearning, we describe how this project sought to reimagine curriculum design as an inclusive and recursive practice. We examine how intentional spaces were created to enable collaboration between academics, professional services staff, and students, challenging traditional hierarchies of expertise and authority. Through reflection on leadership, design processes, and student engagement, we offer insights into the messiness and opportunities with inclusive curriculum development. Our findings suggest that inclusion requires more than just content reform, it demands structural and methodological shifts that centre diverse voices and foster ongoing dialogue.

Proceedings of the Lancaster University Education Conference
Lancaster University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.