The Current Landscape of ESG Adoption in U.S. Banking Institutions

This study examines the evolution of ESG adoption in the U.S. banking sector by integrating regulatory developments with empirical evidence from S&P Global ESG scores for more than 200 commercial banks over the 2014–2024 period. The analysis highlights how major policy milestones, such as the TCFD recommendations, net-zero commitments, the Interagency Climate Principles, and the SEC’s 2024 Climate Disclosure Rule, have reshaped disclosure expectations and influenced ESG scoring trajectories. Using trend analysis and cross-sectional comparison, the study identifies a persistent performance gap between Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) and regional banks, with G-SIBs exhibiting stronger ESG outcomes driven by superior governance structures and more advanced reporting capacity. While regulatory tightening initially exposes data gaps and leads to short-term declines in ESG scores, it ultimately supports more consistent climate-risk management and improved sustainability practices. The findings offer timely insights into the uneven progression of ESG integration within U.S. banking.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17971323
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Current Landscape of ESG Adoption in U.S. Banking Institutions

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

The Current Landscape of ESG Adoption in U.S. Banking Institutions

article en

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of ESG adoption in the U.S. banking sector by integrating regulatory developments with empirical evidence from S&P Global ESG scores for more than 200 commercial banks over the 2014–2024 period. The analysis highlights how major policy milestones, such as the TCFD recommendations, net-zero commitments, the Interagency Climate Principles, and the SEC’s 2024 Climate Disclosure Rule, have reshaped disclosure expectations and influenced ESG scoring trajectories. Using trend analysis and cross-sectional comparison, the study identifies a persistent performance gap between Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) and regional banks, with G-SIBs exhibiting stronger ESG outcomes driven by superior governance structures and more advanced reporting capacity. While regulatory tightening initially exposes data gaps and leads to short-term declines in ESG scores, it ultimately supports more consistent climate-risk management and improved sustainability practices. The findings offer timely insights into the uneven progression of ESG integration within U.S. banking.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.