How a US “Suez Moment” Could Hollow the US Alliance System

Abstract: This article contends that while the United States still fields potent military capabilities, the narrowing military balance with China means that a future Indo-Pacific clash in which Beijing gains a regional edge is no longer implausible. Using the 1956 Suez Crisis as an analogue, the study asks how a public exposure of US capability shortfalls—an American “Suez moment”—would reverberate through Washington’s global alliance network. The article employs a five-factor theory of defense cooperation—covering three structural and two situational factors—to evaluate two post-setback scenarios. In the first, multiple factors erode simultaneously, hollowing NATO and Indo-Pacific hub-and-spoke ties into nominal shells. In the second, enduring structural and favorable situational factors allow the alliances to adapt, with the United States reemerging as first among equals. The study concludes that credible remedies to underlying US capability deficits and thoughtful alliance management based on the studied five factors will determine which path prevails after a potential US “Suez moment.”

Publication Details

Journal
Texas National Security Review
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tns.00025
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How a US “Suez Moment” Could Hollow the US Alliance System

Texas National Security Review
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

How a US “Suez Moment” Could Hollow the US Alliance System

article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article contends that while the United States still fields potent military capabilities, the narrowing military balance with China means that a future Indo-Pacific clash in which Beijing gains a regional edge is no longer implausible. Using the 1956 Suez Crisis as an analogue, the study asks how a public exposure of US capability shortfalls—an American “Suez moment”—would reverberate through Washington’s global alliance network. The article employs a five-factor theory of defense cooperation—covering three structural and two situational factors—to evaluate two post-setback scenarios. In the first, multiple factors erode simultaneously, hollowing NATO and Indo-Pacific hub-and-spoke ties into nominal shells. In the second, enduring structural and favorable situational factors allow the alliances to adapt, with the United States reemerging as first among equals. The study concludes that credible remedies to underlying US capability deficits and thoughtful alliance management based on the studied five factors will determine which path prevails after a potential US “Suez moment.”

Texas National Security ReviewVol. 9(1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.