Keeping it fresh: what attributes of AI recommender systems do consumers value?

Purpose This study examines how consumers evaluate AI-powered retail recommender systems, focusing on key system attributes and their effects on consumer gratification and behavioral intention. In addition, the impact of consumer expertise as a moderator of these effects under different recommendation framing conditions is explored. Design/methodology/approach In Study 1, we conducted an online survey (N = 435) and structural equation modeling to test how four AI recommender attributes–accuracy, diversity, novelty and serendipity–influence three types of consumer gratification and, in turn, behavioral intention. In Study 2, we employed a 2 (framing: accuracy vs. serendipity) × 2 (expertise: low vs. high) between-subjects experiment (N = 204) to examine how these variables affect consumer responses. Findings All four AI attributes positively influence consumer gratification, which subsequently increases behavioral intention. Accuracy, diversity and serendipity exert broader effects across all gratification types, while novelty mainly enhances entertainment and interactivity. A significant interaction also emerged: whereas high-expertise consumers responded more positively to serendipity-based recommendations, low-expertise consumers preferred accuracy-based recommendations. Originality/value By investigating the emerging attributes of AI systems, this study extends the application of affordance theory and the uses and gratifications (U&G) framework to AI-enabled retail settings. Identifying consumer expertise as a critical boundary condition, it reveals how and for whom AI recommendations generate the most value in interactive marketing.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-06-2025-0312
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keeping it fresh: what attributes of AI recommender systems do consumers value?

1 citations
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

Keeping it fresh: what attributes of AI recommender systems do consumers value?

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how consumers evaluate AI-powered retail recommender systems, focusing on key system attributes and their effects on consumer gratification and behavioral intention. In addition, the impact of consumer expertise as a moderator of these effects under different recommendation framing conditions is explored. Design/methodology/approach In Study 1, we conducted an online survey (N = 435) and structural equation modeling to test how four AI recommender attributes–accuracy, diversity, novelty and serendipity–influence three types of consumer gratification and, in turn, behavioral intention. In Study 2, we employed a 2 (framing: accuracy vs. serendipity) × 2 (expertise: low vs. high) between-subjects experiment (N = 204) to examine how these variables affect consumer responses. Findings All four AI attributes positively influence consumer gratification, which subsequently increases behavioral intention. Accuracy, diversity and serendipity exert broader effects across all gratification types, while novelty mainly enhances entertainment and interactivity. A significant interaction also emerged: whereas high-expertise consumers responded more positively to serendipity-based recommendations, low-expertise consumers preferred accuracy-based recommendations. Originality/value By investigating the emerging attributes of AI systems, this study extends the application of affordance theory and the uses and gratifications (U&G) framework to AI-enabled retail settings. Identifying consumer expertise as a critical boundary condition, it reveals how and for whom AI recommendations generate the most value in interactive marketing.

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.