Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

The Japanese version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (J-eHEALS) measure has primarily been applied to younger populations; however, the psychometric properties of the J-eHEALS in older adults have not been investigated. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the J-eHEALS in community-dwelling older adults. A total of 553 adults aged ≥ 65 years (mean age, 73.5 years) attending routine health checkups in a single Japanese municipality completed the J-eHEALS and the Japanese version of the 12-item Health Literacy Scale (J-HLS-Q12). We examined internal consistency, item characteristics, factorial validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance by sex, and convergent and criterion-related validity with general health literacy. The J-eHEALS scores indicated moderate to slightly low perceived eHealth literacy in this population. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94), a stable unidimensional factor structure with acceptable model fit across sexes, and moderate positive associations with general health literacy. Overall, these findings support the J-eHEALS as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing perceived eHealth literacy in older Japanese adults and its suitability for use in research and practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe16010001
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

article en

Abstract

The Japanese version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (J-eHEALS) measure has primarily been applied to younger populations; however, the psychometric properties of the J-eHEALS in older adults have not been investigated. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the J-eHEALS in community-dwelling older adults. A total of 553 adults aged ≥ 65 years (mean age, 73.5 years) attending routine health checkups in a single Japanese municipality completed the J-eHEALS and the Japanese version of the 12-item Health Literacy Scale (J-HLS-Q12). We examined internal consistency, item characteristics, factorial validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, measurement invariance by sex, and convergent and criterion-related validity with general health literacy. The J-eHEALS scores indicated moderate to slightly low perceived eHealth literacy in this population. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.94), a stable unidimensional factor structure with acceptable model fit across sexes, and moderate positive associations with general health literacy. Overall, these findings support the J-eHEALS as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing perceived eHealth literacy in older Japanese adults and its suitability for use in research and practice.

European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and EducationVol. 16(1)
Shimane University (JP)
Shimane University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.