Hybrid marine power systems: techno-economic and environmental optimisation of alternative fuel pathways

This paper offers a comprehensive optimisation tool for the design and assessment of hybrid maritime power systems that combine internal combustion engines, fuel cells, and battery energy storage systems. Using a surrogate-assisted NSGA-II algorithm, the framework concurrently reduces operational expenditure, CO₂ emissions, and life cycle cost assessment. Under constant technical criteria, including system weight and volume, with and without waste heat recovery, four fuel pathways—diesel, LNG, methanol, and ammonia—are evaluated. The results reveal considerable economic and environmental differences compared to the diesel baseline: LNG increases LCCA by 0.5 % (€1.2M) and global warming potential (GWP) by 2 % (1752 kg), while acidification potential (AP) and aerosol formation potential (AFP) decrease by 91 % (914 kg and 1118 kg, respectively). Methanol reduces LCCA by 14.3 % (€35.3M), GWP by 36 % (35,540 kg), and AP/AFP by 81 %, offering a cost-effective and environmentally balanced solution. Ammonia eliminates GWP, AP, and AFP, though with a 10.7 % (€60M) increase in LCCA, demonstrating its potential for long-term decarbonisation. The findings show clear Pareto fronts for every fuel, suggesting that the possible design area is significantly influenced by fuel type. The framework offers practical guidance for designing energy-efficient, low-emission vessels, aiding in sustainable marine energy transitions.

Publication Details

Journal
Brodogradnja
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21278/brod77304
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid marine power systems: techno-economic and environmental optimisation of alternative fuel pathways

Brodogradnja
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

Hybrid marine power systems: techno-economic and environmental optimisation of alternative fuel pathways

article en

Abstract

This paper offers a comprehensive optimisation tool for the design and assessment of hybrid maritime power systems that combine internal combustion engines, fuel cells, and battery energy storage systems. Using a surrogate-assisted NSGA-II algorithm, the framework concurrently reduces operational expenditure, CO₂ emissions, and life cycle cost assessment. Under constant technical criteria, including system weight and volume, with and without waste heat recovery, four fuel pathways—diesel, LNG, methanol, and ammonia—are evaluated. The results reveal considerable economic and environmental differences compared to the diesel baseline: LNG increases LCCA by 0.5 % (€1.2M) and global warming potential (GWP) by 2 % (1752 kg), while acidification potential (AP) and aerosol formation potential (AFP) decrease by 91 % (914 kg and 1118 kg, respectively). Methanol reduces LCCA by 14.3 % (€35.3M), GWP by 36 % (35,540 kg), and AP/AFP by 81 %, offering a cost-effective and environmentally balanced solution. Ammonia eliminates GWP, AP, and AFP, though with a 10.7 % (€60M) increase in LCCA, demonstrating its potential for long-term decarbonisation. The findings show clear Pareto fronts for every fuel, suggesting that the possible design area is significantly influenced by fuel type. The framework offers practical guidance for designing energy-efficient, low-emission vessels, aiding in sustainable marine energy transitions.

BrodogradnjaVol. 77(3)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.