What Can SoTL Learn When We Look Beyond Our Walls: Co-Creation in Feminist Pedagogy

While SoTL has solidified into a more well-defined field, scholarship on teaching and learning has continued in a range of disciplinary sites. This discipline-based work has not always been fully integrated into the SoTL field. In an attempt to combat this research siloing, this narrative literature review examines co-creation practices in publications about feminist pedagogy. Looking across six feminist journals from 2016 through 2023, the review finds many examples of whole-class co-creation in the curriculum which fall into four broad categories: co-creation of knowledge through discussion, co-creation of knowledge through student work, co-creation of assessment through ungrading, and co-creation of the classroom environment itself. Ultimately, the review finds that whole-class co-creation can be accomplished through a series of small practices, while still maintaining some of the valuable benefits to students found in wider pedagogical partnership literature. More broadly, however, the review calls for more attention to scholarship that may not self-identify as SoTL but which can offer invaluable lessons to the field nonetheless, such as disciplinary-based research and writing about teaching.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.59
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Can SoTL Learn When We Look Beyond Our Walls: Co-Creation in Feminist Pedagogy

Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

What Can SoTL Learn When We Look Beyond Our Walls: Co-Creation in Feminist Pedagogy

article en

Abstract

While SoTL has solidified into a more well-defined field, scholarship on teaching and learning has continued in a range of disciplinary sites. This discipline-based work has not always been fully integrated into the SoTL field. In an attempt to combat this research siloing, this narrative literature review examines co-creation practices in publications about feminist pedagogy. Looking across six feminist journals from 2016 through 2023, the review finds many examples of whole-class co-creation in the curriculum which fall into four broad categories: co-creation of knowledge through discussion, co-creation of knowledge through student work, co-creation of assessment through ungrading, and co-creation of the classroom environment itself. Ultimately, the review finds that whole-class co-creation can be accomplished through a series of small practices, while still maintaining some of the valuable benefits to students found in wider pedagogical partnership literature. More broadly, however, the review calls for more attention to scholarship that may not self-identify as SoTL but which can offer invaluable lessons to the field nonetheless, such as disciplinary-based research and writing about teaching.

Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL JournalVol. 13
University of Rhode Island (US)
George Mason University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.