Portion-size anchors as behavioural nudges of healthy eating: testing their usefulness and limits in home settings

Purpose Perceptions of appropriate portion sizes are socially and culturally constructed. Meals consumed at home are often linked to greater self-regulation, as individuals typically have more control over ingredients, preparation and serving sizes. However, increasing exposure to larger portions in out-of-home food environment such as restaurants and fast food outlets risk recalibrating portion norms. The purpose of this study is to test whether portion-size anchors promote healthier home eating and to identify limits to their effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach This study examined how low, medium and high portion-size anchors are associated with consumption intentions at home across five common foods, using a between-subjects survey experiment with 508 adult Taiwanese participants. They reported whether they would exceed the anchor and provided intended consumption amounts. Chi-square tests, Kruskal–Wallis tests and ANCOVA were used to assess anchor effects. Findings The direction of the anchoring effect aligns with expectations derived from the anchor-and-adjustment framework. For most food items, individuals who received the low anchor reported higher intended consumption, suggesting upward adjustment from the initial numerical cue. Conversely, those in the high anchor condition reported lower intended consumption relative to the anchor value, indicative of downward adjustment. This bidirectional movement implies that the anchor operates less as a target and more as a cognitive starting point, from which participants adjust in a context-dependent manner. Practical implications Portion-size anchors offer potential for low-intensity interventions to reduce over-consumption. However, their effectiveness appears contingent on perceived plausibility. Anchors that diverge markedly from prevailing portion norms may elicit counterproductive responses. Originality/value The novelty of this study lies in its examination of how portion-size anchoring effects operate within home-eating contexts in a non-Western setting.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition & Food Science
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-08-2025-0267
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portion-size anchors as behavioural nudges of healthy eating: testing their usefulness and limits in home settings

Nutrition & Food Science
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Portion-size anchors as behavioural nudges of healthy eating: testing their usefulness and limits in home settings

article en

Abstract

Purpose Perceptions of appropriate portion sizes are socially and culturally constructed. Meals consumed at home are often linked to greater self-regulation, as individuals typically have more control over ingredients, preparation and serving sizes. However, increasing exposure to larger portions in out-of-home food environment such as restaurants and fast food outlets risk recalibrating portion norms. The purpose of this study is to test whether portion-size anchors promote healthier home eating and to identify limits to their effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach This study examined how low, medium and high portion-size anchors are associated with consumption intentions at home across five common foods, using a between-subjects survey experiment with 508 adult Taiwanese participants. They reported whether they would exceed the anchor and provided intended consumption amounts. Chi-square tests, Kruskal–Wallis tests and ANCOVA were used to assess anchor effects. Findings The direction of the anchoring effect aligns with expectations derived from the anchor-and-adjustment framework. For most food items, individuals who received the low anchor reported higher intended consumption, suggesting upward adjustment from the initial numerical cue. Conversely, those in the high anchor condition reported lower intended consumption relative to the anchor value, indicative of downward adjustment. This bidirectional movement implies that the anchor operates less as a target and more as a cognitive starting point, from which participants adjust in a context-dependent manner. Practical implications Portion-size anchors offer potential for low-intensity interventions to reduce over-consumption. However, their effectiveness appears contingent on perceived plausibility. Anchors that diverge markedly from prevailing portion norms may elicit counterproductive responses. Originality/value The novelty of this study lies in its examination of how portion-size anchoring effects operate within home-eating contexts in a non-Western setting.

Nutrition & Food ScienceVol. 56(1)
Scotland's Rural College (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.