PERCUTANEOUS REPAIR VERSUS NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess any difference in patient reported outcomes between patients managed operatively with percutaneous repair versus non-operatively following an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Method: This was a single-centre prospective cohort study over a 10-year period performed at University Hospital North Midlands. Patients were asked to fill an Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) at 3-month, 6-month and 12-month intervals post injury. Patients were followed up for up to 12 months. Statistical significance was deemed if p<0.05. Results: 181 patients were included who underwent percutaneous repair with an average age of 46.2 years (SD 12.8). In the non-operative group, 193 patients were included with an average age of 52.8 years (SD 14.3). At 12 months, 98 patients from the operative group (54%) and 103 patients from the non-operative group (53%) filled the ATRS questionnaire. At 3-month and 6-month intervals, there was no statistically significant difference in ATRS scores (p= 0.17 and p=0.70 respectively). At 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference in ATRS scores (p<0.001) in favour of the operative group. When individual ATRS questions were analysed at 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the operative group (p<0.002), especially in relation to intense physical activity. The improvement was seen in all age groups. Four patients in the non-operative group sustained a DVT or PE and five patients had a re-rupture. In the operative group, one patient sustained a DVT, one patient was found to have a surgical site infection, and three patients had a re-rupture. Conclusion: Patients undergoing percutaneous repair have improved ATRS scores at 12 months. Percutaneous repair is therefore a safe and valid management option, especially for highly active patients or heavy labourers. Those patients who do not require these attributes may benefit from non-operative intervention.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2025.17.002
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PERCUTANEOUS REPAIR VERSUS NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE

Orthopaedic Proceedings
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

PERCUTANEOUS REPAIR VERSUS NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE

article en

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess any difference in patient reported outcomes between patients managed operatively with percutaneous repair versus non-operatively following an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Method: This was a single-centre prospective cohort study over a 10-year period performed at University Hospital North Midlands. Patients were asked to fill an Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) at 3-month, 6-month and 12-month intervals post injury. Patients were followed up for up to 12 months. Statistical significance was deemed if p<0.05. Results: 181 patients were included who underwent percutaneous repair with an average age of 46.2 years (SD 12.8). In the non-operative group, 193 patients were included with an average age of 52.8 years (SD 14.3). At 12 months, 98 patients from the operative group (54%) and 103 patients from the non-operative group (53%) filled the ATRS questionnaire. At 3-month and 6-month intervals, there was no statistically significant difference in ATRS scores (p= 0.17 and p=0.70 respectively). At 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference in ATRS scores (p<0.001) in favour of the operative group. When individual ATRS questions were analysed at 12 months, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the operative group (p<0.002), especially in relation to intense physical activity. The improvement was seen in all age groups. Four patients in the non-operative group sustained a DVT or PE and five patients had a re-rupture. In the operative group, one patient sustained a DVT, one patient was found to have a surgical site infection, and three patients had a re-rupture. Conclusion: Patients undergoing percutaneous repair have improved ATRS scores at 12 months. Percutaneous repair is therefore a safe and valid management option, especially for highly active patients or heavy labourers. Those patients who do not require these attributes may benefit from non-operative intervention.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 107-B(SUPP_17)
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust (GB), Royal Stoke University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.