Legitimizing AI: ethical AI in corporate ethics statements

Purpose As global businesses increasingly focus on AI governance, more companies have communicated their commitment to ethical AI practices through corporate AI ethics statements. Drawing on the legitimacy framework, this study investigates how these statements serve as mechanisms to align organizational AI practices with stakeholder expectations, establish ethical benchmarks, and deploy strategic legitimation cues. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative content analysis was conducted on 2024 Fortune Global 500 and Forbes AI 50 companies' AI ethics statements. Findings Findings reveal that explainability, safety, and justice are widely recognized as key ethical AI standards in corporate AI ethics statements. The statements frequently address customers and employees as primary stakeholders, emphasizing explainability and privacy for customers and safety, explainability, and accountability for employees. Substantive cues are more prevalent than symbolic cues in legitimizing these ethical AI standards. Originality/value This study provides an evidence-based legitimacy framework for communicating corporate AI ethics, underscoring the need to align corporate AI practices with universal AI ethics and stakeholder expectations to build stakeholder trust. It offers valuable insights for corporate management and communication professionals for developing and evaluating corporate AI ethics statements.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Communications An International Journal
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-07-2025-0173
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimizing AI: ethical AI in corporate ethics statements

Corporate Communications An International Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Legitimizing AI: ethical AI in corporate ethics statements

article en

Abstract

Purpose As global businesses increasingly focus on AI governance, more companies have communicated their commitment to ethical AI practices through corporate AI ethics statements. Drawing on the legitimacy framework, this study investigates how these statements serve as mechanisms to align organizational AI practices with stakeholder expectations, establish ethical benchmarks, and deploy strategic legitimation cues. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative content analysis was conducted on 2024 Fortune Global 500 and Forbes AI 50 companies' AI ethics statements. Findings Findings reveal that explainability, safety, and justice are widely recognized as key ethical AI standards in corporate AI ethics statements. The statements frequently address customers and employees as primary stakeholders, emphasizing explainability and privacy for customers and safety, explainability, and accountability for employees. Substantive cues are more prevalent than symbolic cues in legitimizing these ethical AI standards. Originality/value This study provides an evidence-based legitimacy framework for communicating corporate AI ethics, underscoring the need to align corporate AI practices with universal AI ethics and stakeholder expectations to build stakeholder trust. It offers valuable insights for corporate management and communication professionals for developing and evaluating corporate AI ethics statements.

Corporate Communications An International JournalVol. 31(1)
City University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Alabama (US), School of Advertising Art (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.