What Is AGI? An Axiomatic Definition of General Intelligence as Lawful Autonomous Continuity

Abstract This paper provides an axiomatic definition of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Prevailing definitions—based on task breadth, benchmark performance, economic impact, or behavioral fluency—fail to specify necessary and sufficient conditions and instead conflate surface capability with intelligence itself. The paper introduces a minimal axiom set governing identity continuity, lawful temporal progression, closed-loop autonomy, bounded self-modification, and legibility of failure. From these axioms, it follows that AGI is not a matter of scale, imitation, or emergence, but a binary property of systems that maintain autonomous continuity over time under lawful constraints. The definition is substrate-independent, benchmark-independent, and empirically falsifiable. The paper makes no claims about existing systems and introduces no implementation; its sole purpose is definitional clarification. By isolating AGI as a structural property rather than a performance metric, the paper enables precise evaluation of future claims and resolves long-standing ambiguity in AGI discourse.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17980188
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is AGI? An Axiomatic Definition of General Intelligence as Lawful Autonomous Continuity

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

What Is AGI? An Axiomatic Definition of General Intelligence as Lawful Autonomous Continuity

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides an axiomatic definition of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Prevailing definitions—based on task breadth, benchmark performance, economic impact, or behavioral fluency—fail to specify necessary and sufficient conditions and instead conflate surface capability with intelligence itself. The paper introduces a minimal axiom set governing identity continuity, lawful temporal progression, closed-loop autonomy, bounded self-modification, and legibility of failure. From these axioms, it follows that AGI is not a matter of scale, imitation, or emergence, but a binary property of systems that maintain autonomous continuity over time under lawful constraints. The definition is substrate-independent, benchmark-independent, and empirically falsifiable. The paper makes no claims about existing systems and introduces no implementation; its sole purpose is definitional clarification. By isolating AGI as a structural property rather than a performance metric, the paper enables precise evaluation of future claims and resolves long-standing ambiguity in AGI discourse.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Is AGI? An Axiomatic Definition of General Intelligence as Lawful Autonomous Continuity · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS