Homosocial and heterosocial academics in masculinity contest cultures

Purpose The purpose of this article is to examine how masculinities are reproduced in academic workplace cultures through homosocial and heterosocial relations in the context of neoliberal university reforms. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior lecturers across two departments of a major social science subject at two Swedish universities. We employ the analytical dimensions of Masculine Contest Cultures (MCC) to analyse gender dynamics within academic settings undergoing managerialist transformation. Findings The study identifies patterns of harmonic versus competitive homosociality and homogenous versus fragmented heterosociality. Competitive homosociality emerges when neoliberal performance management systems disrupt traditional academic hierarchies, while harmonic homosociality persists where organisational narratives celebrate men's achievements. Women's responses vary correspondingly through fragmented heterosociality (withdrawal from traditional supportive roles) or homogenous heterosociality (maintaining collective support for men's privileges and advancement). Research limitations/implications The study is limited to Swedish universities and senior lecturers. Future research should examine intersectional factors and conduct comparative studies across national contexts and career stages. Practical implications Findings suggest that performance management systems can reinforce gender hierarchies when implemented without attention to homosocial and heterosocial dynamics. Universities need to provide better institutional support for middle managers, particularly women, who face contradictory expectations from multiple directions. Social implications Understanding academic institutions as sites of masculinity contests offers insights for creating more equitable academic environments and addressing persistent gender inequalities in higher education by recognising the complex dynamics between men's competitive relations and women's varied responses to masculine workplace cultures. Originality/value This study contributes to understanding gender dynamics in higher education by developing a nuanced conceptual framework for understanding masculinity contests in academic settings and demonstrating how seemingly similar neoliberal transformations produce different gendered outcomes across institutions through the interplay of homosocial and heterosocial relations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-07-2025-0497
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Homosocial and heterosocial academics in masculinity contest cultures

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Homosocial and heterosocial academics in masculinity contest cultures

article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to examine how masculinities are reproduced in academic workplace cultures through homosocial and heterosocial relations in the context of neoliberal university reforms. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior lecturers across two departments of a major social science subject at two Swedish universities. We employ the analytical dimensions of Masculine Contest Cultures (MCC) to analyse gender dynamics within academic settings undergoing managerialist transformation. Findings The study identifies patterns of harmonic versus competitive homosociality and homogenous versus fragmented heterosociality. Competitive homosociality emerges when neoliberal performance management systems disrupt traditional academic hierarchies, while harmonic homosociality persists where organisational narratives celebrate men's achievements. Women's responses vary correspondingly through fragmented heterosociality (withdrawal from traditional supportive roles) or homogenous heterosociality (maintaining collective support for men's privileges and advancement). Research limitations/implications The study is limited to Swedish universities and senior lecturers. Future research should examine intersectional factors and conduct comparative studies across national contexts and career stages. Practical implications Findings suggest that performance management systems can reinforce gender hierarchies when implemented without attention to homosocial and heterosocial dynamics. Universities need to provide better institutional support for middle managers, particularly women, who face contradictory expectations from multiple directions. Social implications Understanding academic institutions as sites of masculinity contests offers insights for creating more equitable academic environments and addressing persistent gender inequalities in higher education by recognising the complex dynamics between men's competitive relations and women's varied responses to masculine workplace cultures. Originality/value This study contributes to understanding gender dynamics in higher education by developing a nuanced conceptual framework for understanding masculinity contests in academic settings and demonstrating how seemingly similar neoliberal transformations produce different gendered outcomes across institutions through the interplay of homosocial and heterosocial relations.

Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International JournalVol. 45(9)
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.