Managing supply chain resilience and cost trade-offs: aligning resources, competencies and capabilities

Existing research on supply chain resilience (SCRES) has advanced significantly; however, without considering cost, resilience remains a myopic concept detached from practical implementation. This study examines the relationship between resilience and cost from a resources, competencies, and capabilities perspective. Our systematic literature review and qualitative analysis of 129 peer-reviewed articles identify the constructs and trade-offs between SCRES and cost. Our findings suggest that the level of SCRES is determined by how companies configure existing and new resources and competencies to develop resilience capabilities.This study proposes an integrated framework for cost-effective SCRES and a practical guideline to support companiesbalance the level of SCRES within cost constraints, considering specific contexts, trade-offs, and the maturity level of resilience. It contributes to the Operations Management field by linking the maturity level of SCRES to firms’ resources, competencies, and capabilities,assisting organisations in making informed decisions to build proactive resilience in uncertain environments.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.124097
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing supply chain resilience and cost trade-offs: aligning resources, competencies and capabilities

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Managing supply chain resilience and cost trade-offs: aligning resources, competencies and capabilities

article en

Abstract

Existing research on supply chain resilience (SCRES) has advanced significantly; however, without considering cost, resilience remains a myopic concept detached from practical implementation. This study examines the relationship between resilience and cost from a resources, competencies, and capabilities perspective. Our systematic literature review and qualitative analysis of 129 peer-reviewed articles identify the constructs and trade-offs between SCRES and cost. Our findings suggest that the level of SCRES is determined by how companies configure existing and new resources and competencies to develop resilience capabilities.This study proposes an integrated framework for cost-effective SCRES and a practical guideline to support companiesbalance the level of SCRES within cost constraints, considering specific contexts, trade-offs, and the maturity level of resilience. It contributes to the Operations Management field by linking the maturity level of SCRES to firms’ resources, competencies, and capabilities,assisting organisations in making informed decisions to build proactive resilience in uncertain environments.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Cambridge Trust, Newnham College, University of Cambridge, Trinity College, University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managing supply chain resilience and cost trade-offs: aligning resources, competencies and capabilities · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS