Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and hospital economics

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a powerful, life-prolonging technology, but is resource-intensive. Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) inpatient data (October 2019–December 2022) to identify ECMO hospitalizations with continuous FFS coverage. We assessed total payment, costs, length of stay (LOS), and predominant medical severity diagnosis-related group (MS-DRG) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. Outcomes were stratified by DRG code, ICD-10 procedure codes, and ECMO type. Hospital costs were estimated using cost-to-charge ratios from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services with a 3-year lag. Results: Continuous ECMO within MS-DRG 003 discharged between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were a subset of hospitalizations analyzed. For continuous central (CC) ECMO, mean costs were $287,334, median costs were $223,766, and the standard deviation (SD) was $224,261. Mean payment was $264,021, median was $218,642, and SD was $157,882. For continuous venoarterial (VA) ECMO, mean costs were $245,448, median was $191,363, and SD was $212,822. Mean payment was $241,617, median was $202,199, and SD was $145,456. For continuous venovenous (VV) ECMO, mean costs were $329,111, median was $256,706, and SD was $285,745. Mean payment was $298,141, median was $237,679, and SD was $198,160. The majority of patients (64%) received VA, which was the only ECMO type with a median payment that surpassed median costs. Rural facilities and teaching hospitals had consistently higher mean frequencies among all ECMO claims (CC, VA, VV) from October 2019 to December 2022 compared to their counterparts (Rural: CC = 2.4, VA = 9.3, VV = 4.9; Urban: CC = 1.4, VA = 6.1, VV = 2.2; Teaching: CC = 2.1, VA = 8.6, VV = 3.4; Non-teaching: CC = 0.5, VA = 1.9, VV = 0.7). Conclusion: VV ECMO had the highest median costs and payment among the ECMO types. Median payment was less than median hospitalization costs for all types of ECMO, apart from continuous VA ECMO.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025043/pdf
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and hospital economics

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and hospital economics

article en

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a powerful, life-prolonging technology, but is resource-intensive. Methods: This retrospective analysis utilized Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) inpatient data (October 2019–December 2022) to identify ECMO hospitalizations with continuous FFS coverage. We assessed total payment, costs, length of stay (LOS), and predominant medical severity diagnosis-related group (MS-DRG) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes. Outcomes were stratified by DRG code, ICD-10 procedure codes, and ECMO type. Hospital costs were estimated using cost-to-charge ratios from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services with a 3-year lag. Results: Continuous ECMO within MS-DRG 003 discharged between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were a subset of hospitalizations analyzed. For continuous central (CC) ECMO, mean costs were $287,334, median costs were $223,766, and the standard deviation (SD) was $224,261. Mean payment was $264,021, median was $218,642, and SD was $157,882. For continuous venoarterial (VA) ECMO, mean costs were $245,448, median was $191,363, and SD was $212,822. Mean payment was $241,617, median was $202,199, and SD was $145,456. For continuous venovenous (VV) ECMO, mean costs were $329,111, median was $256,706, and SD was $285,745. Mean payment was $298,141, median was $237,679, and SD was $198,160. The majority of patients (64%) received VA, which was the only ECMO type with a median payment that surpassed median costs. Rural facilities and teaching hospitals had consistently higher mean frequencies among all ECMO claims (CC, VA, VV) from October 2019 to December 2022 compared to their counterparts (Rural: CC = 2.4, VA = 9.3, VV = 4.9; Urban: CC = 1.4, VA = 6.1, VV = 2.2; Teaching: CC = 2.1, VA = 8.6, VV = 3.4; Non-teaching: CC = 0.5, VA = 1.9, VV = 0.7). Conclusion: VV ECMO had the highest median costs and payment among the ECMO types. Median payment was less than median hospitalization costs for all types of ECMO, apart from continuous VA ECMO.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.