Connectivity and contagion: How industry networks shape the transmission of shocks in global value chains

We study how disruptions propagate through global value chains (GVCs) and how network structure conditions their effects. Using Eora country–industry data for 189 countries and 26 industries (1996–2015), shocks are defined by a distribution-based rule; exposure counts disrupted upstream/downstream partners, and redundancy counts non-disrupted pre-existing links. We estimate fixed-effects impact models—where robustness is smaller contemporaneous deterioration conditional on exposure—and a grouped-time complementary log–log hazard—where resilience is faster return to the pre-shock level. Two findings emerge. First, exposure propagates, depressing output, value added, and exports, and slowing recovery. Second, redundancy mitigates these effects, offsetting the impact and raising the recovery hazard. As an illustration, high-technology activities appear less sensitive on impact and recover faster than low-technology ones, an advantage explained by higher redundancy despite deeper connections. These results suggest that strengthening robustness and resilience requires deepening GVC integration through strategic redundant linkages, rather than retreating from openness.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Economics
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2025.100666
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connectivity and contagion: How industry networks shape the transmission of shocks in global value chains

1 citations
International Economics
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
article

Connectivity and contagion: How industry networks shape the transmission of shocks in global value chains

article en
1 citations

Abstract

We study how disruptions propagate through global value chains (GVCs) and how network structure conditions their effects. Using Eora country–industry data for 189 countries and 26 industries (1996–2015), shocks are defined by a distribution-based rule; exposure counts disrupted upstream/downstream partners, and redundancy counts non-disrupted pre-existing links. We estimate fixed-effects impact models—where robustness is smaller contemporaneous deterioration conditional on exposure—and a grouped-time complementary log–log hazard—where resilience is faster return to the pre-shock level. Two findings emerge. First, exposure propagates, depressing output, value added, and exports, and slowing recovery. Second, redundancy mitigates these effects, offsetting the impact and raising the recovery hazard. As an illustration, high-technology activities appear less sensitive on impact and recover faster than low-technology ones, an advantage explained by higher redundancy despite deeper connections. These results suggest that strengthening robustness and resilience requires deepening GVC integration through strategic redundant linkages, rather than retreating from openness.

International EconomicsVol. 185
Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Économie, Gestion (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.