A Noninvasive Approach to Predict Body and Carcass Weights in Goats and Sheep using in vivo Body Measurements

This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for estimating body weight (BW) and hot car-cass weight (HCW) in small ruminants using in vivo morphometric measurements. A total of 400 animals (250 sheep and 150 goats) were used for BW prediction, and among them, 200 sheep and 64 goats were slaughtered to develop HCW models. The in vivo measurements included chest circumference (CC), body length (BL), and withers height (WH). Model performance was evaluated through K-fold cross-validation, considering the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV), and prediction bias (BIAS). For BW, the combined-species simple model achieved R²= 0.90 and RMSECV= 3.34 kg, while the multiple model yielded R²= 0.91 and RMSECV= 4.44 kg. Sheep-specific models showed R²= 0.82 and RMSECV= 3.47 kg for the simple model, and R²= 0.85 and RMSECV= 4.33 kg for the multiple model. Goat models reached R²= 0.89 and RMSECV= 2.95 kg (simple), and R²= 0.90 and RMSECV= 4.29 kg (multiple). For HCW, the combined simple model (R²=0.79; RMSECV=1.89 kg) and the sheep-specific simple model (R²=0.75; RMSECV=1.90 kg) showed good predictive ability. The simple model for goats presented moderate predictive power (R²=0.73; RMSECV=1.75 kg), whereas the multiple model was not significant. In conclusion, BW and HCW can be accurately estimated using simple linear regression models, which may be applied either separately or jointly across species.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iranian journal of applied animal science
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71798/ijas.2025.1228589
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Noninvasive Approach to Predict Body and Carcass Weights in Goats and Sheep using in vivo Body Measurements

Iranian journal of applied animal science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

A Noninvasive Approach to Predict Body and Carcass Weights in Goats and Sheep using in vivo Body Measurements

article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for estimating body weight (BW) and hot car-cass weight (HCW) in small ruminants using in vivo morphometric measurements. A total of 400 animals (250 sheep and 150 goats) were used for BW prediction, and among them, 200 sheep and 64 goats were slaughtered to develop HCW models. The in vivo measurements included chest circumference (CC), body length (BL), and withers height (WH). Model performance was evaluated through K-fold cross-validation, considering the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV), and prediction bias (BIAS). For BW, the combined-species simple model achieved R²= 0.90 and RMSECV= 3.34 kg, while the multiple model yielded R²= 0.91 and RMSECV= 4.44 kg. Sheep-specific models showed R²= 0.82 and RMSECV= 3.47 kg for the simple model, and R²= 0.85 and RMSECV= 4.33 kg for the multiple model. Goat models reached R²= 0.89 and RMSECV= 2.95 kg (simple), and R²= 0.90 and RMSECV= 4.29 kg (multiple). For HCW, the combined simple model (R²=0.79; RMSECV=1.89 kg) and the sheep-specific simple model (R²=0.75; RMSECV=1.90 kg) showed good predictive ability. The simple model for goats presented moderate predictive power (R²=0.73; RMSECV=1.75 kg), whereas the multiple model was not significant. In conclusion, BW and HCW can be accurately estimated using simple linear regression models, which may be applied either separately or jointly across species.

Iranian journal of applied animal science
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.