Grower-in-the-loop interactive reinforcement learning for greenhouse climate control

Climate control is crucial for greenhouse production as it directly affects crop growth and resource use. Reinforcement learning (RL) has received increasing attention in this field, but still faces challenges, including limited training efficiency and high reliance on initial learning conditions. Interactive RL, which integrates human (grower) input with the RL agent’s learning, offers a potential solution to overcome these challenges. However, interactive RL has not yet been applied to greenhouse climate control. Furthermore, human input is hardly perfect due to the complexity of climate control. The performance of interactive RL may also be limited by imperfect input. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the possibility and performance of applying interactive RL with imperfect inputs into greenhouse climate control, by: (1) developing three representative interactive RL algorithms tailored for greenhouse climate control (reward shaping, policy shaping and control sharing); (2) analyzing how input characteristics are often contradicting, and how the trade-offs between them make grower’s inputs difficult to perfect; (3) proposing a neural network-based approach to enhance the robustness of interactive RL agents under limited input availability; (4) conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the three interactive RL algorithms with imperfect inputs in a simulated greenhouse environment. The demonstration shows that interactive RL incorporating imperfect grower inputs has the potential to improve the performance of the RL agent. Interactive RL algorithms that influence action selection, such as policy shaping and control sharing, perform better when dealing with imperfect inputs, achieving 8.4% and 6.8% improvement in profit, respectively. In contrast, reward shaping, an algorithm that manipulates the reward function, is sensitive to imperfect inputs and leads to a 9.4% decrease in profit. This highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate mechanism when incorporating imperfect inputs. • An interactive RL framework to improve system efficiency and practical applicability. • Developed and tested three interactive RL methods to integrate growers’ expertise. • A neural network-based method enhances RL robustness under imperfect inputs. • Simulation results emphasize the critical role of input integration mechanisms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111312
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grower-in-the-loop interactive reinforcement learning for greenhouse climate control

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
article

Grower-in-the-loop interactive reinforcement learning for greenhouse climate control

article en

Abstract

Climate control is crucial for greenhouse production as it directly affects crop growth and resource use. Reinforcement learning (RL) has received increasing attention in this field, but still faces challenges, including limited training efficiency and high reliance on initial learning conditions. Interactive RL, which integrates human (grower) input with the RL agent’s learning, offers a potential solution to overcome these challenges. However, interactive RL has not yet been applied to greenhouse climate control. Furthermore, human input is hardly perfect due to the complexity of climate control. The performance of interactive RL may also be limited by imperfect input. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the possibility and performance of applying interactive RL with imperfect inputs into greenhouse climate control, by: (1) developing three representative interactive RL algorithms tailored for greenhouse climate control (reward shaping, policy shaping and control sharing); (2) analyzing how input characteristics are often contradicting, and how the trade-offs between them make grower’s inputs difficult to perfect; (3) proposing a neural network-based approach to enhance the robustness of interactive RL agents under limited input availability; (4) conducting a comprehensive evaluation of the three interactive RL algorithms with imperfect inputs in a simulated greenhouse environment. The demonstration shows that interactive RL incorporating imperfect grower inputs has the potential to improve the performance of the RL agent. Interactive RL algorithms that influence action selection, such as policy shaping and control sharing, perform better when dealing with imperfect inputs, achieving 8.4% and 6.8% improvement in profit, respectively. In contrast, reward shaping, an algorithm that manipulates the reward function, is sensitive to imperfect inputs and leads to a 9.4% decrease in profit. This highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate mechanism when incorporating imperfect inputs. • An interactive RL framework to improve system efficiency and practical applicability. • Developed and tested three interactive RL methods to integrate growers’ expertise. • A neural network-based method enhances RL robustness under imperfect inputs. • Simulation results emphasize the critical role of input integration mechanisms.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 242
Northeast Agricultural University (CN), Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (CN), National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture (CN), University of Glasgow (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.