Beyond Events and Perceptions: A Multi-Actor Diagnostic of Insecurity in the Sahel

In fragile and conflict-affected settings, insecurity diagnostics routinely rely on single perspectives—event data, administrative reporting, or population surveys—treating divergence across sources as measurement error. This paper advances a different proposition: insecurity is not only a level to be measured, but a relationship to be diagnosed. We develop and apply a multi-actor diagnostic framework that treats systematic divergence between resident and authority assessments of insecurity as an analytically meaningful outcome rather than a residual. Using harmonised survey instruments across Niger and Mali, we construct a parsimonious Core Insecurity Index capturing current insecurity and perceived change over time, and operationalise misalignment through signed gaps, absolute divergence, and quadrant configurations. The comparative results reveal sharply different structures of misalignment. Niger exhibits wide dispersion and frequent off-diagonal configurations between resident and authority assessments, while Mali shows substantially lower divergence and stronger convergence, with meaningful sub-national variation. These patterns are robust to alternative index constructions and sampling sensitivities. Substantively, the findings demonstrate that insecurity diagnostics fail most predictably where insecurity is lived as anticipatory constraint—through mobility restriction, uncertainty, and everyday adaptation—rather than as administratively visible incidents. Methodologically, the paper reframes triangulation from a logic of validation to one of inference, showing how disagreement itself can function as a diagnostic signal of information asymmetry, governance incentives, and legitimacy conditions. The study contributes a portable diagnostic approach for insecurity measurement in fragile settings, with implications for research design, policy targeting, and security governance. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ARTICLE IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW FOR PUBLICATION

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17963395
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Events and Perceptions: A Multi-Actor Diagnostic of Insecurity in the Sahel

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Beyond Events and Perceptions: A Multi-Actor Diagnostic of Insecurity in the Sahel

article en

Abstract

In fragile and conflict-affected settings, insecurity diagnostics routinely rely on single perspectives—event data, administrative reporting, or population surveys—treating divergence across sources as measurement error. This paper advances a different proposition: insecurity is not only a level to be measured, but a relationship to be diagnosed. We develop and apply a multi-actor diagnostic framework that treats systematic divergence between resident and authority assessments of insecurity as an analytically meaningful outcome rather than a residual. Using harmonised survey instruments across Niger and Mali, we construct a parsimonious Core Insecurity Index capturing current insecurity and perceived change over time, and operationalise misalignment through signed gaps, absolute divergence, and quadrant configurations. The comparative results reveal sharply different structures of misalignment. Niger exhibits wide dispersion and frequent off-diagonal configurations between resident and authority assessments, while Mali shows substantially lower divergence and stronger convergence, with meaningful sub-national variation. These patterns are robust to alternative index constructions and sampling sensitivities. Substantively, the findings demonstrate that insecurity diagnostics fail most predictably where insecurity is lived as anticipatory constraint—through mobility restriction, uncertainty, and everyday adaptation—rather than as administratively visible incidents. Methodologically, the paper reframes triangulation from a logic of validation to one of inference, showing how disagreement itself can function as a diagnostic signal of information asymmetry, governance incentives, and legitimacy conditions. The study contributes a portable diagnostic approach for insecurity measurement in fragile settings, with implications for research design, policy targeting, and security governance. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ARTICLE IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW FOR PUBLICATION

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Elabora Consultoria (Brazil) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.