Redefining Freedom: Sociological Transformations from Ancient Liberties to Global Interdependencies

Freedom has long been central to philosophical inquiry and political discourse, yet sociological analyses remain limited. This article introduces a novel sociological framework structured around two dimensions—superordinate unity (dominant configurations of social, ecological, economic, and political interdependencies) and freedom claims (explicit normative demands for autonomy). I propose a typology of four ideal-typical freedom regimes: ancient, medieval, modern, and planetary. Critically assessing historical forms of freedom within city-states, feudal systems, and nation-states, particularly within the Global North’s historical trajectory, I identify limitations in modern conceptions amid global ecological and socioeconomic crises. I introduce “planetary freedom” as an empirically observable emergent ideal-type, characterized by reflexive awareness of global interdependencies, collective stewardship, and institutionalized cooperation, thus reconceptualizing autonomy as shaped by contemporary global challenges.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Theory
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751251403508
Primary Topic
Globalization and political ideologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Freedom: Sociological Transformations from Ancient Liberties to Global Interdependencies

Sociological Theory
Globalization and political ideologies
article

Redefining Freedom: Sociological Transformations from Ancient Liberties to Global Interdependencies

article en

Abstract

Freedom has long been central to philosophical inquiry and political discourse, yet sociological analyses remain limited. This article introduces a novel sociological framework structured around two dimensions—superordinate unity (dominant configurations of social, ecological, economic, and political interdependencies) and freedom claims (explicit normative demands for autonomy). I propose a typology of four ideal-typical freedom regimes: ancient, medieval, modern, and planetary. Critically assessing historical forms of freedom within city-states, feudal systems, and nation-states, particularly within the Global North’s historical trajectory, I identify limitations in modern conceptions amid global ecological and socioeconomic crises. I introduce “planetary freedom” as an empirically observable emergent ideal-type, characterized by reflexive awareness of global interdependencies, collective stewardship, and institutionalized cooperation, thus reconceptualizing autonomy as shaped by contemporary global challenges.

Sociological Theory
University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Globalization and political ideologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining Freedom: Sociological Transformations from Ancient Liberties to Global Interdependencies · Sociological Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS