On a Pedestal? Violations of Civil Liberties in the United States and Hypocritical Justice

This paper examines how the United States, while promoting democracy and human rights abroad, has repeatedly violated civil liberties at home—especially when national security concerns dominate public discourse. Drawing on the concept of the liberty-security tradeoff, it explores how legislation and practices such as the USA PATRIOT Act, racial profiling, and detention or deportation of minorities infringe constitutional guarantees and international human rights norms. The analysis also introduces the idea of hypocritical justice, whereby a state demands global adherence to civil-liberty standards even as it contravenes them domestically. Through a review of constitutional protections, key statutes, and post-9/11 security policies, the paper demonstrates how fear-driven policies disproportionately harm minority populations and erode cosmopolitan values of human rights. The study concludes that persistent civil-liberty violations weaken U.S. moral authority and impede the development of credible global human rights norms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scholarly review .
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70121/001c.154600
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On a Pedestal? Violations of Civil Liberties in the United States and Hypocritical Justice

Scholarly review .
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

On a Pedestal? Violations of Civil Liberties in the United States and Hypocritical Justice

article en

Abstract

This paper examines how the United States, while promoting democracy and human rights abroad, has repeatedly violated civil liberties at home—especially when national security concerns dominate public discourse. Drawing on the concept of the liberty-security tradeoff, it explores how legislation and practices such as the USA PATRIOT Act, racial profiling, and detention or deportation of minorities infringe constitutional guarantees and international human rights norms. The analysis also introduces the idea of hypocritical justice, whereby a state demands global adherence to civil-liberty standards even as it contravenes them domestically. Through a review of constitutional protections, key statutes, and post-9/11 security policies, the paper demonstrates how fear-driven policies disproportionately harm minority populations and erode cosmopolitan values of human rights. The study concludes that persistent civil-liberty violations weaken U.S. moral authority and impede the development of credible global human rights norms.

Scholarly review .Vol. Winter 2025/2026(15)
University Prep (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.