Waves of Uncertainty: Crude Oil Under Geopolitical, Economic, and ESG Turbulence

ABSTRACT This study employs a dual‐methodology framework combining time‐varying copula analysis and wavelet coherence to examine the multiscale dependence between crude oil benchmarks (WTI and Brent) and three uncertainty indicators: Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and ESG Uncertainty (ESGUI) from 2003 to 2025. Our results reveal a sharp divergence in market reactions: oil prices respond to geopolitical and economic policy shocks with immediate intensity, while reacting to ESG uncertainty through gradual, long‐term repricing. Dynamic copula results demonstrate WTI's more transient, crisis‐sensitive dependence, heavily influenced by domestic factors. Conversely, Brent exhibits more persistent and structurally stable linkages, particularly to global economic demand shocks, consistent with its international benchmark status. Wavelet coherence analysis provides critical frequency‐domain insights, confirming the 2015 Paris Agreement as a catalytic event for ESG integration. Post‐agreement, a significant low‐frequency, anti‐phase relationship emerged where rising ESG uncertainty leads to declining oil returns a structural shift confirming the pricing of “transition risk”. These findings underscore the increasing importance of integrating geopolitical, economic, and sustainability‐linked uncertainties into oil market forecasting and energy risk management strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70412
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waves of Uncertainty: Crude Oil Under Geopolitical, Economic, and ESG Turbulence

Energy Science & Engineering
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Waves of Uncertainty: Crude Oil Under Geopolitical, Economic, and ESG Turbulence

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study employs a dual‐methodology framework combining time‐varying copula analysis and wavelet coherence to examine the multiscale dependence between crude oil benchmarks (WTI and Brent) and three uncertainty indicators: Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and ESG Uncertainty (ESGUI) from 2003 to 2025. Our results reveal a sharp divergence in market reactions: oil prices respond to geopolitical and economic policy shocks with immediate intensity, while reacting to ESG uncertainty through gradual, long‐term repricing. Dynamic copula results demonstrate WTI's more transient, crisis‐sensitive dependence, heavily influenced by domestic factors. Conversely, Brent exhibits more persistent and structurally stable linkages, particularly to global economic demand shocks, consistent with its international benchmark status. Wavelet coherence analysis provides critical frequency‐domain insights, confirming the 2015 Paris Agreement as a catalytic event for ESG integration. Post‐agreement, a significant low‐frequency, anti‐phase relationship emerged where rising ESG uncertainty leads to declining oil returns a structural shift confirming the pricing of “transition risk”. These findings underscore the increasing importance of integrating geopolitical, economic, and sustainability‐linked uncertainties into oil market forecasting and energy risk management strategies.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 14(3)
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University (IN), Mahle (Austria) (AT), University of Sousse (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.