Interdependencies of Factors Affecting Smooth Relationships of Main Contractor–Subcontractor in the Construction of High-Rise Buildings

This study explored the complex relationships between factors influencing the main contractor–subcontractor relationship, addressing the gap in previous research on the reciprocal interactions between these factors. A comprehensive literature review identified 31 factors, refined with input from high-rise construction experts. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, the relative importance of these factors was assessed, while the interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and Matrice d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement (MICMAC) methods illustrated their interdependencies. AHP findings revealed that main contractor-related factors dominated, with the top 15 factors accounting for 75% of the total weight. The most critical factor was the absence of a formal contract, followed by assigning work to new subcontractors and poor subcontractor selection. The ISM model categorized these factors into different levels, with poor subcontractor selection identified as the root cause influencing other issues like work delays and financial strain. ISM-MICMAC analysis further validated these findings, classifying factors into four clusters based on their driving and dependence power. Poor subcontractor selection was the only factor placed in the driving cluster. These findings highlight the importance of improving subcontractor selection practices as a strategy to mitigate risks and enhance project outcomes. The quadrant analysis further refines these insights, categorizing factors based on their importance and influence to guide management strategies. By applying targeted management strategies to the factors identified in the study, stakeholders can mitigate conflicts and ensure smoother project execution.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1426
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdependencies of Factors Affecting Smooth Relationships of Main Contractor–Subcontractor in the Construction of High-Rise Buildings

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Interdependencies of Factors Affecting Smooth Relationships of Main Contractor–Subcontractor in the Construction of High-Rise Buildings

article en

Abstract

This study explored the complex relationships between factors influencing the main contractor–subcontractor relationship, addressing the gap in previous research on the reciprocal interactions between these factors. A comprehensive literature review identified 31 factors, refined with input from high-rise construction experts. Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, the relative importance of these factors was assessed, while the interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and Matrice d’Impacts Croisés Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement (MICMAC) methods illustrated their interdependencies. AHP findings revealed that main contractor-related factors dominated, with the top 15 factors accounting for 75% of the total weight. The most critical factor was the absence of a formal contract, followed by assigning work to new subcontractors and poor subcontractor selection. The ISM model categorized these factors into different levels, with poor subcontractor selection identified as the root cause influencing other issues like work delays and financial strain. ISM-MICMAC analysis further validated these findings, classifying factors into four clusters based on their driving and dependence power. Poor subcontractor selection was the only factor placed in the driving cluster. These findings highlight the importance of improving subcontractor selection practices as a strategy to mitigate risks and enhance project outcomes. The quadrant analysis further refines these insights, categorizing factors based on their importance and influence to guide management strategies. By applying targeted management strategies to the factors identified in the study, stakeholders can mitigate conflicts and ensure smoother project execution.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and ConstructionVol. 18(2)
Addis Ababa Science and Technology University (ET), Adama Science and Technology University (ET)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.