"Public law Compensation as a Remedy under Constitutional Tort Law in Bangladesh"

Abstract Constitutional Tort Law is significant for protecting the rights of citizens, it allows citizens to take necessary action against the government or stakeholders if they violate their fundamental rights. Article 102 (1) of the Constitution of Bangladesh used the word “appropriate” by analyzing this word compensation as a remedy granted under the Constitution of Bangladesh. The distinct framework of the constitution regulates the connection between the state and its population. According to the research, several challenges still need to be addressed. These include people's lack of awareness of their legal rights and alternatives of action, as well as the vagueness surrounding the application of the constitutional tort theory. By shedding light on the legal framework that is essential in determining how citizens interact with their state's constitutional tort laws, this study aims to address this query. Furthermore, by guaranteeing compensation as a remedy, it will be an invaluable tool for scholars, policymakers, and lawyers seeking to understand how to better uphold the rule of law and the rights of the people within Bangladesh's legal systems. There are primary and secondary data in this qualitative study. The author of this paper has concentrated on precedent-setting court rulings and formal print media. The study will end with specific discoveries where more research is needed, as well as some recommendations for the adoption of newly codified laws or regulations.