A multi-theoretical SEM model of strategic enablers driving airline operational performance in Thailand

Operational performance in commercial airlines increasingly depends on the effective alignment of internal capabilities operating within highly regulated, reliability-critical environments. While existing aviation research frequently examines operational drivers in isolation, limited evidence integrates multiple theoretical perspectives or provides empirical insights from emerging Asian markets. This study develops and empirically validates a multi-theoretical structural equation model grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Compliance Management Theory to explain how four strategic enablers—ground operations, crew performance, maintenance and reliability, and regulatory compliance—collectively influence operational performance in Thailand’s commercial airline sector. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed, incorporating qualitative insights from 15 executives and regulatory specialists and quantitative data from 412 employees across six Thai airlines. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated strong reliability and validity, and covariance-based SEM indicated good model fit (RMSEA = 0.056, CFI = 0.938, GFI = 0.916, SRMR = 0.048). All four strategic enablers exerted significant positive effects on operational performance, with regulatory compliance (β = 0.46) and ground operations (β = 0.42) emerging as the strongest contributors. Qualitative findings reinforced these results, emphasizing compliance culture, turnaround precision, and crew coordination as dominant operational priorities. Subgroup analysis revealed clear distinctions between full-service carriers (FSCs) and low-cost carriers (LCCs), reflecting differences in organizational structure, safety culture, and maintenance strategies. The study offers a unified, empirically tested framework that advances theoretical understanding of airline capability systems and provides actionable guidance for managers seeking to strengthen safety governance, frontline execution, and operational reliability in emerging aviation markets.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Transport
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2025.2fcm2t82
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-theoretical SEM model of strategic enablers driving airline operational performance in Thailand

Archives of Transport
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

A multi-theoretical SEM model of strategic enablers driving airline operational performance in Thailand

article en

Abstract

Operational performance in commercial airlines increasingly depends on the effective alignment of internal capabilities operating within highly regulated, reliability-critical environments. While existing aviation research frequently examines operational drivers in isolation, limited evidence integrates multiple theoretical perspectives or provides empirical insights from emerging Asian markets. This study develops and empirically validates a multi-theoretical structural equation model grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), Total Quality Management (TQM), and Compliance Management Theory to explain how four strategic enablers—ground operations, crew performance, maintenance and reliability, and regulatory compliance—collectively influence operational performance in Thailand’s commercial airline sector. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed, incorporating qualitative insights from 15 executives and regulatory specialists and quantitative data from 412 employees across six Thai airlines. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated strong reliability and validity, and covariance-based SEM indicated good model fit (RMSEA = 0.056, CFI = 0.938, GFI = 0.916, SRMR = 0.048). All four strategic enablers exerted significant positive effects on operational performance, with regulatory compliance (β = 0.46) and ground operations (β = 0.42) emerging as the strongest contributors. Qualitative findings reinforced these results, emphasizing compliance culture, turnaround precision, and crew coordination as dominant operational priorities. Subgroup analysis revealed clear distinctions between full-service carriers (FSCs) and low-cost carriers (LCCs), reflecting differences in organizational structure, safety culture, and maintenance strategies. The study offers a unified, empirically tested framework that advances theoretical understanding of airline capability systems and provides actionable guidance for managers seeking to strengthen safety governance, frontline execution, and operational reliability in emerging aviation markets.

Archives of TransportVol. 75(3)
Rajamangala University of Technology (TH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A multi-theoretical SEM model of strategic enablers driving airline operational performance in Thailand · Archives of Transport (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS