Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In clinical practice and research, it is necessary to use a standardized measurement tool to accurately determine dietary adherence in adults with celiac disease. The aim of this study is to validate the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT) in the Turkish patients with celiac disease. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The CDAT was translated using forward-backward translation method, reviewed by experts, and tested for comprehensibility. The final revised version of the CDAT was completed by 97 adults diagnosed with celiac disease and following a gluten-free diet. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation) after re-administration within 2 weeks. <i>Results</i>: Exploratory factor analysis yielded a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.69, with Bartlett's test of sphericity being significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). EFA indicated a single-factor structure, explaining 55% of the total variance. CFA showed acceptable fit indices for the model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.45, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.07, GFI = 0.94, AGFI = 0.88). Reliability analyses indicated Cronbach's alpha of 0.70, and a test-retest correlation of 0.92. Items 5 and 6 were removed from the Turkish version of the CDAT because their factor loadings were below 0.40. <i>Conclusions</i>: The Turkish CDAT is valid and reliable for rapid, standardized assessment of adherence to a gluten-free diet in adults with celiac disease.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61122239
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test

Medicina
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test

article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In clinical practice and research, it is necessary to use a standardized measurement tool to accurately determine dietary adherence in adults with celiac disease. The aim of this study is to validate the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test (CDAT) in the Turkish patients with celiac disease. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The CDAT was translated using forward-backward translation method, reviewed by experts, and tested for comprehensibility. The final revised version of the CDAT was completed by 97 adults diagnosed with celiac disease and following a gluten-free diet. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability (Pearson correlation) after re-administration within 2 weeks. <i>Results</i>: Exploratory factor analysis yielded a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.69, with Bartlett's test of sphericity being significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). EFA indicated a single-factor structure, explaining 55% of the total variance. CFA showed acceptable fit indices for the model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.45, CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.07, GFI = 0.94, AGFI = 0.88). Reliability analyses indicated Cronbach's alpha of 0.70, and a test-retest correlation of 0.92. Items 5 and 6 were removed from the Turkish version of the CDAT because their factor loadings were below 0.40. <i>Conclusions</i>: The Turkish CDAT is valid and reliable for rapid, standardized assessment of adherence to a gluten-free diet in adults with celiac disease.

MedicinaVol. 61(12)
Çankırı Karatekin University (TR), Klaipėda University (LT), Cukurova University (TR)
Klaipedos Universitetas
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.