Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Research Universities in Russia

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University) (MIPT) in relation to universities with a comparable number of scientific and pedagogical staff. Based on the official indicators of university performance monitoring from the period 2020–2024 and the data from the Financial Management Quality Rating (FMQR), the following blocks were compared: scale (contingent, number of researchers), financial stability (total income and its structure), scientific performance (volume of R&D), and normalized indicators per researcher and per student. It has been shown that, with a comparable number of researchers, MIPT leads in terms of total income, R&D volume, income per researcher, and R&D per researcher. St. Petersburg State University ranks second in terms of income per researcher and is the leader in terms of the share of extrabudgetary funding.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditor
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/1998-0701-2025-11-11-44-52
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Research Universities in Russia

Auditor
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Research Universities in Russia

article en

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University) (MIPT) in relation to universities with a comparable number of scientific and pedagogical staff. Based on the official indicators of university performance monitoring from the period 2020–2024 and the data from the Financial Management Quality Rating (FMQR), the following blocks were compared: scale (contingent, number of researchers), financial stability (total income and its structure), scientific performance (volume of R&D), and normalized indicators per researcher and per student. It has been shown that, with a comparable number of researchers, MIPT leads in terms of total income, R&D volume, income per researcher, and R&D per researcher. St. Petersburg State University ranks second in terms of income per researcher and is the leader in terms of the share of extrabudgetary funding.

AuditorVol. 11(11)
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (RU), Moscow Power Engineering Institute (RU), Moscow Aviation Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.