Abstracts from the 11th Visual Science of Art Conference (VSAC)Wiesbaden, Germany, August 21st–23rd, 2025

Background. We investigated how aesthetic judgements and sensory sensitivity influence people’s gaze and attention to visual art. Previous research has shown that people tend to look longer at art works they find aesthetically pleasing, but for a large part, these findings have been obtained in controlled laboratory environments. Moreover, little is known about how individual differences in sensory sensitivity may moderate this relationship. Method. 61 participants, equipped with a wearable eye-tracker, looked at visual art works in an art gallery. After their visit, participants evaluated each art work on aesthetic dimensions (e.g., beauty, liking, emotional impact, complexity), and filled in the Glasgow Sensory Questionnaire (GSQ) to provide a measure of self-reported sensory sensitivity. Research question. Do people’s aesthetic judgements predict visual attention to art works, and is visual attention moderated by sensory sensitivity? We hypothesized that 1) higher aesthetic judgements will correlate with longer total and average fixation durations, and 2) more sensory sensitive visitor’s will show increased total and average fixation durations when looking at art. First results. We found a significant positive correlation between subjective beauty/liking judgements and total fixation duration (ρ = .12, p = .024), but no significant correlation was found between subjective beauty/liking and average fixation duration. Sensory sensitivity positively correlated with total fixation duration (ρ = .18, p = .001), and subjective beauty/liking correlated with sensory sensitivity (ρ = .12, p = .024). Discussion. Initial results show that subjective judgements of beauty/liking and sensory sensitivity predict visual attention to art works in a gallery environment. We are currently working on additional analyses on how other aesthetic judgements (e.g., emotional impact, interest, complexity) influence measures of visual attention, and how sensory sensitivity affect these relationships.

Publication Details

Journal
Art & Perception
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10072
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstracts from the 11th Visual Science of Art Conference (VSAC)Wiesbaden, Germany, August 21st–23rd, 2025

Art & Perception
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Abstracts from the 11th Visual Science of Art Conference (VSAC)Wiesbaden, Germany, August 21st–23rd, 2025

article en

Abstract

Background. We investigated how aesthetic judgements and sensory sensitivity influence people’s gaze and attention to visual art. Previous research has shown that people tend to look longer at art works they find aesthetically pleasing, but for a large part, these findings have been obtained in controlled laboratory environments. Moreover, little is known about how individual differences in sensory sensitivity may moderate this relationship. Method. 61 participants, equipped with a wearable eye-tracker, looked at visual art works in an art gallery. After their visit, participants evaluated each art work on aesthetic dimensions (e.g., beauty, liking, emotional impact, complexity), and filled in the Glasgow Sensory Questionnaire (GSQ) to provide a measure of self-reported sensory sensitivity. Research question. Do people’s aesthetic judgements predict visual attention to art works, and is visual attention moderated by sensory sensitivity? We hypothesized that 1) higher aesthetic judgements will correlate with longer total and average fixation durations, and 2) more sensory sensitive visitor’s will show increased total and average fixation durations when looking at art. First results. We found a significant positive correlation between subjective beauty/liking judgements and total fixation duration (ρ = .12, p = .024), but no significant correlation was found between subjective beauty/liking and average fixation duration. Sensory sensitivity positively correlated with total fixation duration (ρ = .18, p = .001), and subjective beauty/liking correlated with sensory sensitivity (ρ = .12, p = .024). Discussion. Initial results show that subjective judgements of beauty/liking and sensory sensitivity predict visual attention to art works in a gallery environment. We are currently working on additional analyses on how other aesthetic judgements (e.g., emotional impact, interest, complexity) influence measures of visual attention, and how sensory sensitivity affect these relationships.

Art & PerceptionVol. 13(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abstracts from the 11th Visual Science of Art Conference (VSAC)Wiesbaden, Germany, August 21st–23rd, 2025 · Art & Perception (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS