<scp>CHINESE UNIVERSITIES AS URBAN DEVELOPERS</scp> : The Tale of Two Innovation Complexes in Nanjing, China

Abstract Chinese universities are important but undertheorized players in the production of urban built environments. Most work focuses on purpose‐built university towns, neglecting the redevelopment of underutilized downtown campuses. Therefore, this article considers how two publicly funded universities in Nanjing attempted to establish ‘innovation complexes’ in their older, poorly maintained urban campuses. These two real estate developments were legitimized by promises of technological innovation that would spearhead China’s transition to an innovation‐driven economy. They accommodated both universities’ evolving spatial needs and revived underutilized spaces for more ‘productive’ purposes. Both universities worked with local government and external actors to develop their innovation complexes. However, their different academic strengths, prior experience with knowledge valorization and place histories affected the resulting partnerships and led to divergent outcomes. This comparison underscores the breadth of university real estate practices, evolving town–gown relationships, and the politics of urban regeneration, as China seeks to replace economic growth driven by land development with an innovation‐driven economy.

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.70053
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CHINESE UNIVERSITIES AS URBAN DEVELOPERS : The Tale of Two Innovation Complexes in Nanjing, China

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

CHINESE UNIVERSITIES AS URBAN DEVELOPERS : The Tale of Two Innovation Complexes in Nanjing, China

article en

Abstract

Abstract Chinese universities are important but undertheorized players in the production of urban built environments. Most work focuses on purpose‐built university towns, neglecting the redevelopment of underutilized downtown campuses. Therefore, this article considers how two publicly funded universities in Nanjing attempted to establish ‘innovation complexes’ in their older, poorly maintained urban campuses. These two real estate developments were legitimized by promises of technological innovation that would spearhead China’s transition to an innovation‐driven economy. They accommodated both universities’ evolving spatial needs and revived underutilized spaces for more ‘productive’ purposes. Both universities worked with local government and external actors to develop their innovation complexes. However, their different academic strengths, prior experience with knowledge valorization and place histories affected the resulting partnerships and led to divergent outcomes. This comparison underscores the breadth of university real estate practices, evolving town–gown relationships, and the politics of urban regeneration, as China seeks to replace economic growth driven by land development with an innovation‐driven economy.

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
University College Dublin, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.