Design and evaluation of integrated energy systems under component failures for balancing reliability, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions

The design of integrated energy systems (IESs) often targets N -1 reliability, i.e., the ability to prevent undersupply despite the failure of any single component. Achieving N -1 reliability requires the installation of redundant or oversized components, which increases costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To navigate design trade-offs, multi-objective design optimization has been proposed. However, the accuracy of reliability metrics in design optimization is limited, especially for IESs with energy storage. Inaccurate reliability metrics can misguide IES planners, leading to insufficient reliability or unnecessarily high costs and GHG emissions. To ensure accurate reliability metrics, we propose the BRACE method, which combines multi-objective design optimization with Monte Carlo-based design evaluation. BRACE’s novelty is the consideration of component failures and the storage contribution to reliability during design optimization and evaluation. Additionally, BRACE integrates a novel variant of the N -1 reliability approach that improves upon state-of-the-art variants by optimizing storage reserves and considering the transition between failure-free and N -1 operation. Applied to two case studies, BRACE reveals significant trade-offs between reliability, costs, and GHG emissions. Design evaluation shows that compromise designs can achieve sufficient reliability if minor undersupply events are acceptable. The novel N -1 variant reduces the total objective value of generated designs by up to 1.3 % compared to existing variants. Furthermore, it extends the applicability of the N -1 approach to IESs that require storage reserves to bridge failures. Altogether, BRACE supports the reliable design of energy systems with storages. • Combines multi-objective design optimization with Monte Carlo reliability assessment. • Optimizes storage reserves with novel variant of N -1 approach. • Provides duration and magnitude of potential undersupply events. • Reveals compromise designs with low costs and emissions but high reliability.

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120946
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design and evaluation of integrated energy systems under component failures for balancing reliability, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions

2 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.46
article

Design and evaluation of integrated energy systems under component failures for balancing reliability, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions

article en
2 citations

Abstract

The design of integrated energy systems (IESs) often targets N -1 reliability, i.e., the ability to prevent undersupply despite the failure of any single component. Achieving N -1 reliability requires the installation of redundant or oversized components, which increases costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To navigate design trade-offs, multi-objective design optimization has been proposed. However, the accuracy of reliability metrics in design optimization is limited, especially for IESs with energy storage. Inaccurate reliability metrics can misguide IES planners, leading to insufficient reliability or unnecessarily high costs and GHG emissions. To ensure accurate reliability metrics, we propose the BRACE method, which combines multi-objective design optimization with Monte Carlo-based design evaluation. BRACE’s novelty is the consideration of component failures and the storage contribution to reliability during design optimization and evaluation. Additionally, BRACE integrates a novel variant of the N -1 reliability approach that improves upon state-of-the-art variants by optimizing storage reserves and considering the transition between failure-free and N -1 operation. Applied to two case studies, BRACE reveals significant trade-offs between reliability, costs, and GHG emissions. Design evaluation shows that compromise designs can achieve sufficient reliability if minor undersupply events are acceptable. The novel N -1 variant reduces the total objective value of generated designs by up to 1.3 % compared to existing variants. Furthermore, it extends the applicability of the N -1 approach to IESs that require storage reserves to bridge failures. Altogether, BRACE supports the reliable design of energy systems with storages. • Combines multi-objective design optimization with Monte Carlo reliability assessment. • Optimizes storage reserves with novel variant of N -1 approach. • Provides duration and magnitude of potential undersupply events. • Reveals compromise designs with low costs and emissions but high reliability.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 350
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.